Homework was a moderate level, but exams required applying abstract concepts from class to create original proofs, making them moderate to difficult.
What you’ll be able to do
Recall and state the formal definitions of mathematical objects and their properties used in elementary linear algebra (e.g., dimension of a vector space, linear dependence of a set of vectors, etc.).
Use the standard methods and tools of mathematical argument in the context of linear algebra (e.g., direct and indirect methods, the construction of examples and counterexamples, induction arguments, 1st order logic, set theory, quantifiers, etc.).
Verify if a mathematical construct does or does not have the condition of having a particular property (e.g., that a matrix is invertible, that a set is a vector subspace, that a vector is an eigenvector, etc.).
Recall and state standard theorems used in elementary linear algebra (e.g., symmetric matrices are diagonalizable, linear operators with non-trivial kernel are not invertible, etc.).
Verify the premises of standard theorems in elementary linear algebra in order to apply their conclusions in the context of longer arguments (e.g., that a given matrix has zero determinant and therefore has nullity larger than one, etc.).
Prove or disprove statements related to the definitions, properties, and theorems of elementary linear algebra using the techniques of mathematical argument.
Perform standard computations in the context of linear algebra (e.g., finding the rank of a matrix, computing the determinant of a square matrix, etc.).
Convey formal mathematical arguments in English using appropriate mathematical terminology and notation.
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 4.54/5 from 54
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
No course-specific feedback yet.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
ALEXANDER HANHART is recorded teaching in Spring 2016. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ANDREI CALDARARU is recorded teaching in Fall 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ANTOINE REMOND-TIEDREZ is recorded teaching in Fall 2021, Spring 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
FLORIAN BERTRAND is recorded teaching in Fall 2009. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
HOWARD BECKER is recorded teaching in Fall 2014. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JACK BURKART is recorded teaching in Fall 2021. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JUSTIN SUKIENNIK is recorded teaching in Spring 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
PAUL APISA is recorded teaching in Fall 2022, Spring 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SHAOSAI HUANG is recorded teaching in Fall 2018, Spring 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
STEFFEN LEMPP is recorded teaching in Spring 2014, Fall 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
YANG YANG is recorded teaching in Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 35
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
0 / 35
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
A former math major described the course as the hardest thing they had ever done, stating that the rigor helped them later in their studies.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.18 GPA, 54.2% A/AB (n=96 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.15 GPA, 51.6% A/AB (n=64 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.09 GPA, 54.4% A/AB (n=90 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Howard Becker
Homework was a moderate level, but exams required applying abstract concepts from class to create original proofs, making them moderate to difficult.
Past student reviews · Antoine Remond-Tiedrez
One student found that using quizzes to examine definitions was an effective method for learning the material.
Topics
Vector spaces, linear transformations, and eigenvalues
Set theory, logic, and proof techniques
Skills
Mathematical argumentation and proof writing
Core concepts of linear algebra including vector spaces, transformations, and eigenvalues
Standard linear algebra computations such as rank and determinants
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.782.78–3.773.77average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.25 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.093.09GPA
Higher than 88% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
9090letter grades
More recorded grades than 6464% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.