Historical reviews of Hanbaek Lyu, Sebastien Roch: Reviewers describe the homework and exams as challenging, with some noting that the course feels like a proof-heavy extension of linear algebra rather than a data science course.
(MATH 320, 340, 341, 345, or 375) and (STAT/MATH 309, 431,MATH 531, or STAT 311) and (MATH 322, 341, 375, 421, or 467, or COMP SCI 577), graduate/professional standing, or declared in Mathematics VISP (graduate or undergraduate)
Raw average: 2.63/5 from 19
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
No course-specific feedback yet.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews of Sebastien Roch: Sebastien Roch teaches MATH 535 with mixed results. Some students find his lectures confusing and rigorous, requiring self-study, while others praise his deep understanding and helpfulness. Reviewers disagree on exam difficulty, with some finding them easy and others challenging.
HANBAEK LYU is recorded teaching in Spring 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SEBASTIEN ROCH is recorded teaching in Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2024, Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
47 / 50
10
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Historical reviews for MATH 535 are polarized, with students describing instructors as either confusing and rigorous or helpful and accessible. The course material relies heavily on self-study and specific lecture notes provided by the teaching staff.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.44 GPA, 63.8% A/AB (n=47 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.46 GPA, 76.5% A/AB (n=34 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.87 GPA, 91.3% A/AB (n=46 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviews of Hanbaek Lyu, Sebastien Roch: Reviewers describe the homework and exams as challenging, with some noting that the course feels like a proof-heavy extension of linear algebra rather than a data science course.
Historical reviews of Hanbaek Lyu, Sebastien Roch: Students report that instructors are generally accessible and willing to help, with lecture notes and an online textbook serving as key resources for self-learning and exam preparation.
Topics
Matrix factorizations
Optimization theory and algorithms
Probabilistic models
Finite Markov chains
Skills
Matrix factorization and optimization
Probabilistic modeling and Markov chains
Applied mathematical problem solving
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A82.6%82.6%
AB8.7%8.7%
B8.7%8.7%
BC0.0%0.0%
C0.0%0.0%
D0.0%0.0%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.873.87GPA
Higher than 7474% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
4646letter grades
More recorded grades than 3030% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.