The course features a sharp difficulty curve and strict grading with no rounding. Workload consists of minimal homework, with three exams comprising almost the entire grade.
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 4.59/5 from 22 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Raw average: 4.55/5 from 11 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Raw average: 3.20/5 from 5 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Scott Hiatt receives criticism for mediocre lectures using fill-in-the-blank worksheets. Reviewers describe him as a tough grader with strict cutoffs and minimal exam help, noting practice exams often differ from actual tests.
Conversely, other students praise Hiatt for being helpful and explaining concepts clearly. These reviewers appreciate his care for student understanding and the availability of previous exams that closely mirror actual tests.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2025: 3.09 GPA, 44.9% A/AB (n=118 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.11 GPA, 45.8% A/AB (n=240 letter grades).
Raw average: 1.00/5 from 2 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Historical reviews of Leslie Smith, Yang Yang: Leslie Smith is a knowledgeable lecturer who answers questions well, though her conceptual and theoretical approach may not suit all students. Yang Yang explains concepts clearly through examples, making the course manageable with attention and homework, despite lacking posted notes.
ADRIANA NENCIU is recorded teaching in Fall 2006. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
BING WANG is recorded teaching in Fall 2012, Spring 2013. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JOSEPH MILLER is recorded teaching in Spring 2011. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
LAURENTIU MAXIM is recorded teaching in Fall 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
LESLIE SMITH is recorded teaching in Spring 2008, Spring 2009, Fall 2009, Fall 2010, Fall 2011, Fall 2014, Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2023, Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MIKHAIL FELDMAN is recorded teaching in Fall 2008. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SAVERIO SPAGNOLIE is recorded teaching in Fall 2015, Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SCOTT HIATT is recorded teaching in Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SEAN ROSTAMI is recorded teaching in Spring 2014. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SIGURD ANGENENT is recorded teaching in Spring 2010, Spring 2011. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
YANG YANG is recorded teaching in Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
YUCHEN LIAO is recorded teaching in Fall 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
92 / 96
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
120 / 120
1
DIS 302
Classroom Instruction
30 / 30
0
DIS 361
Classroom Instruction
30 / 32
1
DIS 362
Classroom Instruction
32 / 32
0
LEC 004
Classroom Instruction
121 / 128
1
LEC 003
Classroom Instruction
117 / 120
0
DIS 342
Classroom Instruction
31 / 32
0
DIS 343
Classroom Instruction
30 / 32
0
DIS 301
Classroom Instruction
30 / 30
0
DIS 303
Classroom Instruction
27 / 30
0
DIS 363
Classroom Instruction
32 / 32
0
DIS 371
Classroom Instruction
29 / 30
0
DIS 304
Classroom Instruction
30 / 30
0
DIS 344
Classroom Instruction
31 / 32
0
DIS 364
Classroom Instruction
27 / 32
0
DIS 372
Classroom Instruction
31 / 30
1
DIS 373
Classroom Instruction
30 / 30
0
DIS 374
Classroom Instruction
30 / 30
0
LEC 005
Classroom Instruction
236 / 256
0
DIS 381
Classroom Instruction
31 / 32
0
DIS 382
Classroom Instruction
31 / 32
0
DIS 383
Classroom Instruction
30 / 32
0
DIS 384
Classroom Instruction
29 / 32
0
DIS 385
Classroom Instruction
29 / 32
0
DIS 386
Classroom Instruction
29 / 32
0
DIS 387
Classroom Instruction
29 / 32
0
DIS 388
Classroom Instruction
28 / 32
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Scott Hiatt’s MATH 320 reviews are polarized, with students describing him as either helpful and clear or boring and ineffective. Exams are the primary grade component, and preparation strategies vary significantly among reviewers.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.14 GPA, 46.6% A/AB (n=746 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.07 GPA, 45.9% A/AB (n=610 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.16 GPA, 50.3% A/AB (n=787 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
The course features a sharp difficulty curve and strict grading with no rounding. Workload consists of minimal homework, with three exams comprising almost the entire grade.
Students disagree on lecture value; some find them helpful for exam prep while others call them a waste of time. Reviewers note that practice exams may not match actual test content, and some suggest self-study via homework is more effective.
Topics
Linear algebra: linear systems, matrices, vector spaces, linear transformations, eigenvalues, and eigenvectors.
Differential equations: first order ODE, homogeneous/nonhomogeneous linear systems, and numerical methods.
Skills
Applying analytical and numerical techniques to solve differential equations.
Analyzing linear systems, matrix algebra, vector spaces, and linear transformations.
Grades
Historical instructor
Fall 2026 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.762.76–3.403.40average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade. The center uses 5 same-season terms, weighted toward recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.11 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Fall 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.163.16GPA
Higher than 1010% of other courses
in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
787787letter grades
More recorded grades than 9999% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30
recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded
grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.