A student found the homework fair and noted that quizzes and exams were very manageable if they stayed on top of the material.
What you’ll be able to do
Recall and state the formal definitions of the mathematical objects and their properties used in elementary point set topology (e.g., abstract topological spaces, metric spaces, Hausdorff spaces, compact spaces, etc.).
Use such definitions to argue that a mathematical object does or does not have the condition of being a particular type or having a particular property (e.g., connected, compact Hausdorff).
Recall and state the standard theorems of point set topology (e.g., Extension theorems, Tychnoff Theorem, etc.) and recall the arguments for these theorems and the underlying logic of their proofs.
Use such theorems in the context of longer arguments by examining their premises (e.g., proving a map is a homeomorphism).
Prove or disprove statements related to the above definitions, properties, and theorems using techniques of mathematical argument (direct methods, indirect methods, constructing examples and counterexamples, induction, etc.).
Convey arguments using English and appropriate mathematical terminology, notation and grammar.
Identify applications of course content in areas of modern research.
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 5.00/5 from 6
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 5.0/5 raw quality · 2.0/5 difficulty · 3
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Paige Hillen
Paige Hillen explains difficult topology concepts clearly and keeps lectures organized. Students found the homework fair, noting it prepared them well for manageable quizzes and exams.
Students described Hillen as a caring and wonderful professor, with one noting that the easy homework and tests might have limited deeper learning.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2026: 3.31 GPA, 62.5% A/AB (n=40 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Alex Waldron, Botong Wang
Alex Waldron explained content clearly and was described as funny, though students noted a fair amount of homework. Botong Wang’s lectures were well-received for providing recorded sessions and shared notes, making the nuanced material more accessible. Exams were considered fair, and homework was tricky but manageable.
ALEX WALDRON is recorded teaching in Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
AMIR ASSADI is recorded teaching in Spring 2016. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
AUTUMN KENT is recorded teaching in Fall 2014. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
BOTONG WANG is recorded teaching in Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Fall 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
LU WANG is recorded teaching in Fall 2015, Fall 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MARISSA LOVING is recorded teaching in Fall 2022, Spring 2024, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MUSTAFA KALAFAT is recorded teaching in Fall 2007, Fall 2008. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
NOAH SCHWEBER is recorded teaching in Spring 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
PAIGE HILLEN is recorded teaching in Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SEAN PAUL is recorded teaching in Spring 2009, Spring 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2020, Spring 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
XIUXIONG CHEN is recorded teaching in Spring 2008. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
YONG-GEUN OH is recorded teaching in Spring 2011. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 50
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Paige Hillen explained difficult topology concepts clearly and kept lectures organized. Students described her as caring and a great professor for the course.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.03 GPA, 44.8% A/AB (n=29 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.20 GPA, 55.4% A/AB (n=65 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.31 GPA, 62.5% A/AB (n=40 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Paige Hillen
A student found the homework fair and noted that quizzes and exams were very manageable if they stayed on top of the material.
Past student reviews · Paige Hillen
One student felt the homeworks and tests were pretty easy, resulting in less learning than expected.
Topics
Topological spaces, connectedness, compactness, separation axioms, and metric spaces
Standard theorems of point set topology, including Extension theorems and Tychnoff Theorem
Skills
State formal definitions of topological objects and properties
Prove or disprove statements using mathematical argument techniques
Convey mathematical arguments with appropriate terminology and notation
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Spring 2027.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A60.0%60.0%
AB2.5%2.5%
B20.0%20.0%
BC0.0%0.0%
C10.0%10.0%
D2.5%2.5%
F5.0%5.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.313.31GPA
Higher than 1717% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
4040letter grades
More recorded grades than 2121% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.