This Thermodynamics course covers the first and second laws, properties of gases and vapors, energy-systems analysis including power and refrigeration cycles, and reacting mixtures.
Students reported a significant workload with three homework assignments per week. These assignments were described as manageable but essential, as exams mirrored the homework problems.
What you’ll be able to do
Define both open and closed systems using a sketch
Apply the first law to properly analyze open steady flow systems and closed systems
Apply the second law to properly analyze open steady flow systems and closed systems
Calculate property changes for ideal gases, incompressible substances, and real substances such as water
Calculate First and Second Law efficiencies of engineering devices
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 4.74/5 from 50
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 5.0/5 raw quality · 2.4/5 difficulty · 26
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Gregory Nellis
Gregory Nellis teaches with a clear, no-nonsense style that makes thermodynamics understandable. Students reported doing three homework assignments per week, noting that the exams closely mirrored the homework and were generally easier or fairer than the assignments. He was described as funny and effective at answering questions, with students finding the workload manageable because it prepared them well for tests.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2024: 3.58 GPA, 76.9% A/AB (n=143 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.35 GPA, 65.9% A/AB (n=229 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.19 GPA, 53.3% A/AB (n=105 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Past student reviews · David Foster, Mario Trujillo, Kristofer Dressler
David Foster encouraged questions and explained testing methods, though he assigned a high volume of homework. Mario Trujillo taught fundamentals thoroughly and graded leniently. Kristofer Dressler assigned three weekly assignments, and students found his lectures less prepared, focusing on philosophical thinking rather than material instruction.
DAVID FOSTER is recorded teaching in Spring 2009. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
FRANKLIN MILLER is recorded teaching in Fall 2009, Fall 2010, Spring 2011, Fall 2012, Fall 2013, Fall 2014, Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2022, Fall 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
GREGORY NELLIS is recorded teaching in Fall 2007, Spring 2009, Fall 2009, Spring 2010, Fall 2012, Spring 2014, Spring 2018, Fall 2019, Fall 2020, Fall 2022, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JAY MARTIN is recorded teaching in Fall 2007, Spring 2008, Spring 2010. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JOHN PFOTENHAUER is recorded teaching in Spring 2007, Spring 2008, Spring 2010, Fall 2013, Fall 2015, Spring 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
KRISTOFER DRESSLER is recorded teaching in Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MARIO TRUJILLO is recorded teaching in Fall 2008, Fall 2009. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SANFORD KLEIN is recorded teaching in Spring 2007, Spring 2008, Spring 2009, Spring 2012, Spring 2013, Spring 2014, Spring 2015. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SCOTT SANDERS is recorded teaching in Fall 2008, Fall 2010, Fall 2011, Fall 2013, Fall 2014, Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017, Spring 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2023, Spring 2024, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
TOM KRUPENKIN is recorded teaching in Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013, Fall 2014, Fall 2020, Spring 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
TONY GROTJAN is recorded teaching in Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 149
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
0 / 320
0
DIS 301
Classroom Instruction
0 / 32
0
DIS 302
Classroom Instruction
0 / 32
0
DIS 303
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 304
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 305
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 306
Classroom Instruction
0 / 32
0
DIS 307
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 308
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 309
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 310
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 311
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 312
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Gregory Nellis taught the course with a clear, no-nonsense style that made thermodynamics understandable. Students found his lectures engaging and felt well-prepared for exams.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.35 GPA, 65.9% A/AB (n=229 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.25 GPA, 56.6% A/AB (n=212 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.15 GPA, 54.0% A/AB (n=248 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Gregory Nellis
Students reported a significant workload with three homework assignments per week. These assignments were described as manageable but essential, as exams mirrored the homework problems.
Past student reviews · Gregory Nellis
Nellis rarely mentioned his own textbook during lectures, though students noted it contained similar examples to the homework. Many found it helpful to consult the book when stuck on problems.
Topics
First and second laws of thermodynamics.
Thermodynamic properties of gases, vapors, and gas-vapor mixtures.
Energy-systems analysis including power cycles, refrigeration cycles, and air-conditioning processes.
Thermodynamics of reacting mixtures.
Skills
Defining open and closed systems using sketches.
Applying the first and second laws to analyze open steady flow and closed systems.
Calculating property changes for ideal gases, incompressible substances, and real substances like water.
Calculating First and Second Law efficiencies of engineering devices.
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.602.60–3.973.97average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.20 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.153.15GPA
Higher than 1010% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
248248letter grades
More recorded grades than 9090% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.