Exams were reported as difficult to finish in time, and the instructor did not curve grades. One student noted that homework formatting took more time than the actual heat transfer problems.
What you’ll be able to do
Predict the rate of heat transfer for steady state situations involving conduction, convection, and radiation
Develop numerical models of 0-D, 1-D, and 2-D transient temperature distributions
Develop computer models of radiation situations involving multiple grey surfaces
Simulate and optimize heat exchangers for a variety of applications
Qualitatively predict the velocity and temperature distribution associated with boundary layers in convection problems
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 4.17/5 from 6
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Dakotah Thompson
Dakotah Thompson was described as approachable and helpful during office hours, though some students found lectures dry or hard to follow. Reviewers noted his exams were difficult to finish in the allotted time and that he did not curve grades, which made achieving high marks challenging despite his supportive teaching style.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2023: 2.84 GPA, 15.9% A/AB (n=69 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.09 GPA, 36.8% A/AB (n=68 letter grades); Spring 2026: 2.73 GPA, 21.4% A/AB (n=70 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Allison Mahvi
Professor Allison Mahvi received mixed feedback on the course's difficulty. One student found the class tough, noting that lecture examples were poor preparation for assignments and that homework emphasized EES debugging over concepts. Another student praised her handwritten lectures and caring demeanor, describing exams as somewhat difficult but recommending her highly.
ALLISON MAHVI is recorded teaching in Spring 2023, Spring 2024, Spring 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ARGANTHAEL BERSON is recorded teaching in Spring 2017, Spring 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
DAKOTAH THOMPSON is recorded teaching in Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Spring 2022, Spring 2023, Spring 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
DAVID FOSTER is recorded teaching in Spring 2007. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
FRANK PFEFFERKORN is recorded teaching in Fall 2006, Fall 2007, Fall 2008, Spring 2009, Fall 2009, Fall 2010, Fall 2011. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
FRANKLIN MILLER is recorded teaching in Spring 2010, Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Spring 2014, Spring 2016, Fall 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
GREGORY NELLIS is recorded teaching in Fall 2006, Spring 2007, Fall 2008, Fall 2010, Spring 2013, Fall 2013, Fall 2015, Fall 2018, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MICHAEL CHEADLE is recorded teaching in Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2016, Fall 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 168
0
DIS 301
Classroom Instruction
0 / 28
0
DIS 302
Classroom Instruction
0 / 28
0
DIS 303
Classroom Instruction
0 / 28
0
DIS 304
Classroom Instruction
0 / 28
0
DIS 305
Classroom Instruction
0 / 28
0
DIS 306
Classroom Instruction
0 / 28
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Dakotah Thompson was a helpful and approachable instructor who worked with students until they grasped concepts. Students described him as friendly and willing to make time for those struggling with the material.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.16 GPA, 47.0% A/AB (n=149 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.38 GPA, 62.7% A/AB (n=193 letter grades); Spring 2026: 2.89 GPA, 31.3% A/AB (n=150 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Dakotah Thompson
Exams were reported as difficult to finish in time, and the instructor did not curve grades. One student noted that homework formatting took more time than the actual heat transfer problems.
Past student reviews · Dakotah Thompson
Lectures were sometimes hard to follow or dry, but office hours were consistently described as easy and informative. The instructor made an effort to support students through the challenging course content.
Topics
Conduction, convection, and radiation.
Heat-exchanger principles.
Skills
Predicting heat transfer rates in steady state conditions.
Developing numerical models for transient temperature distributions.
Creating computer models for radiation between multiple grey surfaces.
Simulating and optimizing heat exchangers.
Qualitatively predicting velocity and temperature distributions in boundary layers.
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.822.82–3.293.29average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.10 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
2.892.89GPA
Higher than 33% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
150150letter grades
More recorded grades than 8181% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.