Social Psychology
Introduces classic and contemporary social psychology theories and research with an emphasis on experimental methodology.
Summary
Historical reviews of Emily Dix, Judith Harackiewicz, Tina Winston: Workload often involves extensive textbook reading and detailed, difficult exams that require memorization. Some instructors make attendance mandatory or grade heavily on confusing, wordy tests, while others offer spaced assignments and clear grading criteria.
Grade history
↗letter grades
All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors
Prerequisites
Course mapProfessors
Fall 2026No instructors recorded for this selection.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews of Emily Dix: Emily Dix is described as nice and knowledgeable but criticized for dry, rambling lectures and extremely detailed exams that require exhaustive textbook reading. Reviewers found the grading harsh and the course experience less engaging than other options.
ABIGAIL LETAK is recorded teaching in Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
EMILY DIX is recorded teaching in Fall 2017, Fall 2018. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JUDITH HARACKIEWICZ is recorded teaching in Fall 2019, Fall 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MEGAN BRUUN is recorded teaching in Fall 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
TINA WINSTON is recorded teaching in Fall 2024, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026Schedule loads here as you scroll.
| Section | Mode | Enrolled / capacity | Waitlist |
|---|
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.
Meeting source records
No records available.
Student experience
the class
Historical reviews of Abigail Letak, Megan Bruun: Students highly recommend the course when taught by engaging instructors like Abigail Letak and Megan Bruun, praising their clear lectures and caring nature. Conversely, reviews for Emily Dix, Judith Harackiewicz, and Tina Winston highlight significant frustrations with dry teaching, confusing exams, and passive-aggressive attitudes, though one review for Harackiewicz was positive.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2024: 3.19 GPA, 43.8% A/AB (n=267 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.32 GPA, 58.7% A/AB (n=184 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.50 GPA, 71.0% A/AB (n=193 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviews of Emily Dix, Judith Harackiewicz, Tina Winston: Workload often involves extensive textbook reading and detailed, difficult exams that require memorization. Some instructors make attendance mandatory or grade heavily on confusing, wordy tests, while others offer spaced assignments and clear grading criteria.
Historical reviews of Abigail Letak, Megan Bruun: With supportive professors, students find the material interesting and lectures engaging, with accessible instructors who explain topics clearly and answer questions.
Topics
Skills
Grades
Fall 2026 · Projected
Before grades are released– average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade. The center uses 5 same-season terms, weighted toward recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
7 earlier forecasts · 0.11 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Fall 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
GPA
Higher than % of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
letter grades
More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.
Selected offering source records
No offering records for the selected term.
Raw records
[]
Student reviews
Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.
Read original reviews
Grade history
Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.
Explore recorded gradesModel outputs & technical records
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces
Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.
Model & dataset provenance
{
"model": "nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4",
"model_revision": "1355db6a052410cfd62085d94b58866fd0f2c3c5",
"task_version": "14",
"output_id": "9bbf13364195d6df7200a4cd931a4af8e35798ca3d9c5f5865fe458bedb1ff50",
"requirements_status": "valid",
"dataset_revision": "e243353dcb7d79b7247ced91d69443ef4c2a6349",
"observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00"
}