Engineering Communication

Engineering Communication teaches theory and practice in planning, preparing, and critiquing technical reports, proposals, and workplace correspondence.

offering recorded3 credits

Summary

1 / 6

Thomas McGlamery’s section requires significant time and effort, with some students finding the grading harsh and lectures monotonous. Reviewers note that the assignments are tedious and demand consistent research and rewriting, though the work prepares students for the final paper.

Grade history

average GPA
letter grades
A
AB
B
BC
C
D
F

All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors

Prerequisites

Course map

Satisfied Communications A and junior or senior standing only

    • Satisfied Communications A
    • junior or senior standing only
    take all
INTEREGR 397 used by

“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.

Prerequisite text tree
  • All of
    • Satisfied Communications A
    • junior or senior standing only

Professors

Fall 2026
/5Adjusted rating
/5RMP difficulty
captured reviews
About this rating

Raw average: 4.42/5 from 12 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.

RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.67 GPA, 88.5% A/AB (n=26 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.52 GPA, 83.3% A/AB (n=24 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.64 GPA, 88.0% A/AB (n=25 letter grades).

/5Adjusted rating
/5RMP difficulty
captured reviews
About this rating

Raw average: 5.00/5 from 3 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.

RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.

Nathan Jung receives consistent praise for making the course manageable through engaging lectures and clear assignment expectations. Reviewers highlight his supportive nature, useful resume workshops, and encouragement of AI integration. He is described as an easy grader who genuinely cares about student success and skill development.

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.79 GPA, 97.0% A/AB (n=67 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.84 GPA, 98.5% A/AB (n=65 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.84 GPA, 98.4% A/AB (n=64 letter grades).

/5Adjusted rating
/5RMP difficulty
captured reviews
About this rating

Raw average: 4.50/5 from 2 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.

RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.

Elizabeth Boyle is described as nice and an engaging lecturer who makes lectures enjoyable. Reviewers note that active participation is required beyond mere attendance, and she is generally well-recommended compared to other sections.

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.79 GPA, 93.8% A/AB (n=65 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.84 GPA, 98.4% A/AB (n=64 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.82 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=52 letter grades).

/5Adjusted rating
/5RMP difficulty
captured reviews
About this rating

Raw average: 3.44/5 from 9 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.

RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.28 GPA, 57.9% A/AB (n=38 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.37 GPA, 63.4% A/AB (n=41 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.38 GPA, 68.4% A/AB (n=38 letter grades).

/5Adjusted rating
/5RMP difficulty
captured reviews
About this rating

Raw average: 2.50/5 from 8 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.

RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.

No course-specific feedback yet.

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.77 GPA, 93.8% A/AB (n=65 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.84 GPA, 93.8% A/AB (n=64 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.73 GPA, 87.3% A/AB (n=63 letter grades).

Reviewers describe Thomas Mcglamery as a kind instructor who provides useful feedback and clear expectations.

Some criticize his grading as harsh regarding grammar, and note the course demands significant time with assignments leading to a final paper.

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.51 GPA, 66.7% A/AB (n=45 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.54 GPA, 69.4% A/AB (n=49 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.50 GPA, 72.5% A/AB (n=40 letter grades).

Historical instructors & teaching patterns

Historical reviews of Patrick Fessenbecker: Patrick Fessenbecker engages students well and cares about the subject, but his course management is flawed. Reviewers cite difficult Canvas navigation, harsh feedback, and last-minute assignment notices as significant concerns.

BARTOSZ SKARZYNSKI is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

DEBI GALLEY is recorded teaching in Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

ELIZABETH BOYLE is recorded teaching in Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

LAURA GROSSENBACHER is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

NATHAN JUNG is recorded teaching in Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

PATRICK FESSENBECKER is recorded teaching in Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

THOMAS MCGLAMERY is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

Calendar & sections

Fall 2026

Schedule loads here as you scroll.

SectionModeEnrolled / capacityWaitlist
LEC 002Classroom Instruction27 / 271
LEC 003Classroom Instruction22 / 220
LEC 004Classroom Instruction21 / 221
LEC 007Classroom Instruction21 / 223
LEC 009Classroom Instruction26 / 271
LEC 010Classroom Instruction25 / 270
LEC 001Classroom Instruction26 / 270
LEC 011Classroom Instruction26 / 270
LEC 005Classroom Instruction22 / 223
LEC 014Online Only19 / 204
LEC 018Classroom Instruction21 / 220
LEC 021Classroom Instruction26 / 270
LEC 006Classroom Instruction22 / 221
LEC 008Classroom Instruction21 / 221
LEC 012Classroom Instruction26 / 270
LEC 013Online Only17 / 203
LEC 019Classroom Instruction22 / 222
LEC 020Classroom Instruction22 / 224

Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.

Meeting source records

Student experience

the class

Students highly recommend Nathan Jung and Elizabeth Boyle for their engaging lectures, clear expectations, and supportive feedback. Jung is praised as an easy grader who improves writing skills, while Boyle is noted for her engaging style and manageable workload.

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.65 GPA, 85.1% A/AB (n=450 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.67 GPA, 85.3% A/AB (n=450 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.66 GPA, 87.5% A/AB (n=431 letter grades).

difficulty & workload

Thomas McGlamery’s section requires significant time and effort, with some students finding the grading harsh and lectures monotonous. Reviewers note that the assignments are tedious and demand consistent research and rewriting, though the work prepares students for the final paper.

McGlamery’s grading is criticized for penalizing grammar despite emphasizing content, which frustrates engineering students. In contrast, Boyle’s section features a semester-long group project that constitutes the majority of the grade, requiring careful group selection.

Topics

  • Technical report and proposal writing
  • Persuasive argumentation
  • Ethical decision-making
  • Multidisciplinary communication
  • Research strategies
  • Collaborative work
  • Oral presentations

Skills

  • Engineering, science, and technology communication
  • Planning, preparing, and critiquing technical documents
  • Persuasive argumentation
  • Ethical decision-making strategies
  • Multidisciplinary communication skills
  • Research strategies
  • Collaborative work
  • Oral presentations

Grades

Historical instructor

Fall 2026 · Projected

Before grades are released

average GPA

Approximate 80% prediction interval

About this estimate

The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade. The center uses 5 same-season terms, weighted toward recent results.

The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.

4 earlier forecasts · 0.07 GPA average error.

Grades over time

Through Fall 2026

More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data

Where this course fits relative to

Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels

GPA

Higher than % of other courses in this group.

Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range

letter grades

More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.

Typical course in this group: letter grades.

About this comparison

1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.

Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.

Sources & history

UW–Madison

Catalog & offerings

Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.

Catalog observation history

Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.

Selected offering source records
INTEREGR 397 · Fall 2026

Engineering Communication

Recorded 2026-09-07
Raw records
[
  {
    "run_id": "20260907T155543-ce3781c4",
    "semester": "1272",
    "observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00",
    "offering_id": "1272:496:006701",
    "course_id": "INTEREGR 397",
    "course_uid": "course_66966e4ec32912b4aa013042",
    "term_id": "1272",
    "source_course_id": "006701",
    "source_subject_id": "496",
    "title": "Engineering Communication",
    "credits_min": 3,
    "credits_max": 3,
    "typically_offered": "Fall, Spring, Summer"
  }
]
Rate My Professors

Student reviews

Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.

Read original reviews
Madgrades

Grade history

Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.

Explore recorded grades
Model outputs & technical records
nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces

Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.

Model & dataset provenance
{
  "model": "nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4",
  "model_revision": "1355db6a052410cfd62085d94b58866fd0f2c3c5",
  "task_version": "14",
  "output_id": "924b48602b431e45dfb8ac0acbf96062564dd2a72217915818a63696f61beb69",
  "requirements_status": "needs_review",
  "dataset_revision": "e243353dcb7d79b7247ced91d69443ef4c2a6349",
  "observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00"
}