The course is a challenge that tests conceptual thermodynamics understanding. Homework is low-point but harshly graded, and success depends on completing assigned readings rather than relying solely on lectures or homework problems.
(MATH 234 or 376), (PHYSICS 201, 207, 247,E M A 202 or M E 240),CBE 250, and (CBE 255 or concurrent enrollment), or member of Engineering Guest Students
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 3.00/5 from 6 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Matt Gebbie is described as caring, friendly, and accommodating regarding student well-being and schedule conflicts. Reviewers note he is approachable and takes feedback seriously, with one student predicting continued improvement in his teaching.
However, multiple reviewers criticize his lecture structure as disorganized, confusing, and lacking clear plans or visual aids. Students report that his explanations are often convoluted, he covers irrelevant topics in depth, and he is inaccessible or unhelpful through online platforms.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2022: 3.01 GPA, 29.3% A/AB (n=58 letter grades); Spring 2023: 3.01 GPA, 36.2% A/AB (n=58 letter grades); Fall 2024: 3.04 GPA, 35.9% A/AB (n=39 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews of Brian Pfleger, James Miller: James Miller and Brian Pfleger are praised for making challenging material clear and engaging. Miller is highly accessible and makes the course interesting, though exams are time-constrained. Pfleger effectively applies thermodynamics to real-world scenarios to keep dry lectures interesting, but students also report exams are excessively long.
BRIAN PFLEGER is recorded teaching in Spring 2010, Spring 2011. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
CHRISTIAN TORMOS is recorded teaching in Fall 2016, Spring 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JAMES MILLER is recorded teaching in Fall 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
KATELYN DAHLKE is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2023, Spring 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MATT GEBBIE is recorded teaching in Spring 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
NATASHA MALLETTE is recorded teaching in Fall 2014, Fall 2015, Spring 2016. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
RAHUL SUJANANI is recorded teaching in Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
REGINA MURPHY is recorded teaching in Spring 2013, Fall 2013, Spring 2015, Spring 2016. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ROSS SWANEY is recorded teaching in Fall 2011, Spring 2014, Spring 2019, Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
44 / 66
0
DIS 302
Classroom Instruction
33 / 35
0
DIS 303
Classroom Instruction
11 / 33
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Matt Gebbie is described as caring and accommodating, but his teaching quality is polarizing. Students report disorganized lectures and a heavy reliance on independent textbook study, with opinions ranging from fine instruction to poor delivery.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.10 GPA, 47.9% A/AB (n=48 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.01 GPA, 37.8% A/AB (n=45 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.10 GPA, 46.2% A/AB (n=65 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
The course is a challenge that tests conceptual thermodynamics understanding. Homework is low-point but harshly graded, and success depends on completing assigned readings rather than relying solely on lectures or homework problems.
Lectures are frequently criticized as disorganized, unstructured, and confusing due to a lack of lecture plans or visual aids. Conversely, TAs are noted as helpful for clarifying concepts, and the professor is praised for being approachable and accommodating regarding exam conflicts.
Topics
Thermodynamics and energy balances
Pure fluid behavior
Chemical reaction equilibria
Skills
Thermodynamic analysis and energy balance calculations
Fluid behavior and reaction equilibrium modeling
Grades
Historical instructor
Fall 2026 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.732.73–3.223.22average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade. The center uses 5 same-season terms, weighted toward recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.11 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Fall 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.103.10GPA
Higher than 88% of other courses
in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
6565letter grades
More recorded grades than 4848% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30
recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded
grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.