Workload varies significantly based on group partners, with projects ranging from minimal to excessive time commitments, while exams are generally considered manageable.
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 3.25/5 from 8 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Raw average: 3.15/5 from 73 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Florian Heimerl is described as a good lecturer but criticized for disorganization, including outdated syllabi, grading changes, and slow lectures. Reviewers report unresponsive support and chaotic group projects, with some calling him mediocre or the worst professor they have had.
Other reviewers praise Heimerl for clear, helpful explanations and accessibility, noting he makes the poorly structured course manageable. They highlight that while projects and TAs are flawed, his lectures are effective and he is generally nice and approachable.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.30 GPA, 57.2% A/AB (n=327 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.34 GPA, 63.1% A/AB (n=521 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.42 GPA, 69.3% A/AB (n=475 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Meenakshi Syamkumar and Ashley Samuelson receive high praise for clear explanations and responsiveness. Syamkumar’s lectures help students grasp difficult concepts, while Samuelson is noted for her teaching style and attention to student needs. Reviewers describe their classes as engaging and well-structured, contrasting with other historical instructors who received mixed feedback.
ANDREW KUEMMEL is recorded teaching in Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Fall 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ASHLEY SAMUELSON is recorded teaching in Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
CONNOR BAILEY is recorded teaching in Fall 2023, Fall 2024, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
DANIEL FINER is recorded teaching in Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
DEBRA DEPPELER is recorded teaching in Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2021. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
FLORIAN HEIMERL is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
GARY DAHL is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
208 / 207
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
203 / 205
0
LEC 010
Classroom Instruction
33 / 50
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Reviewers describe Florian Heimerl as a good professor with clear lectures, but criticize the course structure and group projects as poorly organized and unhelpful.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.29 GPA, 58.5% A/AB (n=670 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.38 GPA, 65.6% A/AB (n=564 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.42 GPA, 69.3% A/AB (n=475 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Workload varies significantly based on group partners, with projects ranging from minimal to excessive time commitments, while exams are generally considered manageable.
Students report frustration with uncoordinated instructional staff and unclear project requirements, though one reviewer notes Heimerl is great at explaining things while another finds him unresponsive.
Topics
Balanced search trees, graphs, and hash tables.
Advanced language features, inheritance, polymorphism, and performance optimization.
Skills
Implementation and analysis of advanced data structures (trees, graphs, hash tables).
Professional software design, implementation, and code quality standards.
Grades
Historical instructor
Fall 2026 · Projected
Before grades are released
3.133.13–3.443.44average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade. The center uses 5 same-season terms, weighted toward recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
7 earlier forecasts · 0.09 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Fall 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.423.42GPA
Higher than 2323% of other courses
in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
475475letter grades
More recorded grades than 9797% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30
recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded
grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.