Covers scientific method and experimental, observational, and correlational research designs in psychological science, including demonstrations and experiments.
The workload includes a heavy semester-long research paper and lengthy labs that some students found to be busy work, alongside a large volume of information on lecture slides.
What you’ll be able to do
Develop skills to find, read, and understand scientific articles and to synthesize scientific literature
Through an iterative process, learn how to effectively communicate research in multiple modalities
Develop critical thinking skills, examine linkages between method and results, consider alternative explanations, and become more knowledgeable consumers of research
Generate and test hypotheses; design psychological research using different approaches, data collection tools, and analysis techniques
Correctly interpret and convey statistical results via text, tables, and figures
Learn key principles of science, including use of evidence, how to evaluate scientific reliability and validity, and how to fairly and thoroughly evaluate research inside and outside the classroom.
Learn that ethical principles, behavior, and decision-making pertain to all aspects of the research process
Identify how psychological science can inform societal practices and policies. Review and apply what you learned.
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 1.00/5 from 2
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Andrea Donovan
Students found Andrea Donovan's mandatory attendance and written assignments tedious, noting that instructions were often unclear despite the class being easy. One student dropped the course because they felt she did not explain material well and would not provide help.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.17 GPA, 56.5% A/AB (n=69 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.31 GPA, 66.9% A/AB (n=133 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.20 GPA, 57.0% A/AB (n=135 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Raw average: 3.03/5 from 30
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 3.1/5 raw quality · 3.5/5 difficulty · 28
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Julia Greenberg
Julia Greenberg is described as caring and approachable, with exams that students found fair and similar to practice problems. The course includes a heavy semester-long research proposal that reviewers found challenging due to unclear rubrics, though Greenberg structures it to be as manageable as possible. Labs are described as tedious, with strict grading on minor errors, so students recommended using TA office hours and studying from the textbook rather than relying solely on lectures.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.53 GPA, 77.3% A/AB (n=132 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.44 GPA, 75.6% A/AB (n=135 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.35 GPA, 66.9% A/AB (n=133 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Allyson Bennett, Jonathan Gallimore
Allyson Bennett managed a heavy homework load by breaking the IRP project into chunks, which students found well-organized and supportive. Jonathan Gallimore’s section featured no exams but required weekly quizzes, labs, and a major paper. One student found the class disorganized with rubric errors, while another appreciated his relatable teaching style and the outside work assigned to prepare for class.
ALLYSON BENNETT is recorded teaching in Fall 2013, Fall 2014, Fall 2015, Fall 2016, Fall 2017, Fall 2018, Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2021. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ANDREA DONOVAN is recorded teaching in Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JONATHAN GALLIMORE is recorded teaching in Fall 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JULIA GREENBERG is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
KARL ROSENGREN is recorded teaching in Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018, Spring 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
REBECCA ADDINGTON is recorded teaching in Fall 2006, Spring 2007, Fall 2007, Spring 2008, Fall 2008, Fall 2009, Spring 2010, Fall 2010, Spring 2011, Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013, Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Spring 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
TINA WINSTON is recorded teaching in Fall 2006, Spring 2007, Fall 2007, Spring 2008, Fall 2008, Spring 2009, Fall 2009, Spring 2010, Fall 2010, Spring 2011, Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013, Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2015, Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 72
0
LAB 301
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 302
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 303
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 304
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 307
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 308
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 305
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 306
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
0 / 72
0
LEC 004
Classroom Instruction
0 / 72
0
LEC 003
Classroom Instruction
0 / 72
0
LAB 309
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 310
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 311
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 312
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 313
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 314
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 315
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
LAB 316
Classroom Instruction
0 / 18
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Students described PSYCH 225 as a tedious but manageable course, with Dr. Greenberg helping to make the experience bearable through her approachability and clear lecture slides.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.40 GPA, 68.5% A/AB (n=257 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.38 GPA, 71.3% A/AB (n=268 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.27 GPA, 61.9% A/AB (n=268 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Julia Greenberg
The workload includes a heavy semester-long research paper and lengthy labs that some students found to be busy work, alongside a large volume of information on lecture slides.
Past student reviews · Julia Greenberg
Students frequently cited nit-picky grading and unclear rubrics for assignments as frustrating aspects, noting that attention to detail and using TAs were essential for success.
Topics
Scientific method
Research designs (experimental, observational, correlational)
Core issues in research methods across psychology
Research ethics
Skills
Use of experimental, observational, and correlational research designs
Find, read, understand, and synthesize scientific literature
Generate and test hypotheses; design psychological research
Interpret and convey statistical results via text, tables, and figures
Apply ethical principles to the research process
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
3.023.02–3.543.54average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.13 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.273.27GPA
Higher than 1515% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
268268letter grades
More recorded grades than 9191% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.