Research in Kinesiology covers the research process, including hypothesis development, ethics, study design, measurement, statistical concepts, and presenting results.
Past reviews described exams as hard and the paper as time-consuming. Students felt the workload was excessive for a 2-credit course, resembling a 4-credit load.
What you’ll be able to do
Demonstrate knowledge of the research process and different research methods
Utilize common research tools and resources
Retrieve, read, and evaluate primary and secondary sources of information
Communicate key elements of study design and analysis
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 5.00/5 from 5
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
No course-specific feedback yet.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
MARTHA MCCURDY is recorded teaching in Spring 2009, Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2015, Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 50
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
0 / 50
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Students noted that the instructor provided good feedback on group projects, though some found the overall experience frustrating due to grading expectations.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.98 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=100 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.97 GPA, 98.0% A/AB (n=49 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.97 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=98 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Martha McCurdy
Past reviews described exams as hard and the paper as time-consuming. Students felt the workload was excessive for a 2-credit course, resembling a 4-credit load.
Past student reviews · Martha McCurdy
Reviewers reported that grading criteria were unclear and standards were harsh, making it difficult to earn an A despite significant effort.
Topics
Hypothesis development, ethics, study design, measurement, and statistics
Current research in the Department of Kinesiology
Skills
Knowledge of the research process and different research methods
Utilizing common research tools and resources
Retrieving, reading, and evaluating primary and secondary sources
Communicating key elements of study design and analysis
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
3.663.66–4.004.00average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.11 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.973.97GPA
Higher than 9090% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
9898letter grades
More recorded grades than 6969% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.