Explore courses

Historical reviews of Almita Miranda, Revel Sims: Workload varies by instructor; Sims' sections involved community-based research and interviews with no exams, while Miranda's sections required heavy reading loads that some students struggled to manage.[1, 2]

The course involves three essays and exams, with grading heavily weighted toward writing assignments and participation, though study guides are provided for tests.[1, 2, +2]

Historical reviews of Farid Masrour, Gregory Nirshberg, Katie Deaven: Workload includes problem sets, midterms, and a final, with a probability unit for QRA credit. Reviews suggest exams rely on in-class practice and homework patterns, requiring focused attendance to understand material not covered in slides.[1, 2, 3]

Grading relies on three difficult papers, though readings are optional.[1]

Historical reviews of Aaron Yarmel, Arun Baxter, Casey Rufener: Workload varies by instructor. Some require minimal weekly assignments and easy exams, while others demand difficult readings and multiple open-note tests. Attendance policies also differ, ranging from highly encouraged to mandatory.[1, 2, +3]

Historical reviews of David O'Brien, Harry Brighouse, Kevin Dewan, Marcos Picchio: Workload typically includes three papers, two exams or tests, and weekly discussion posts or short responses, which reviewers generally found manageable.[1, 2, +2]