Teaches research-based best practices for success in college-level math, including study skills and problem-solving.
Offering recorded · Fall 2026
Historical reviews of Tracii Gustafson : Reviewers describe the workload as consisting of mandatory attendance with point deductions for illness and assignments deemed useless or impossible to perfect.
Precalculus covers properties, equations, and graphs of elementary functions, providing the algebra and trigonometry skills required for calculus.
Offering recorded · Fall 2026
Historical reviews of Prerna Gera: Prerna Gera's course required over ten hours of weekly homework and relied heavily on the textbook due to unclear lectures.
Introduction to differential and integral calculus, plane analytic geometry, and transcendental functions with applications.
Offering recorded · Fall 2026
Joseph Miller's course involves minimal homework and exams that are considered manageable, though one student noted the lack of notecards. Chanwoo Kim's course is described as difficult, with grades heavily dependent on midterms and lectures deemed unhelpful.
MATH 222 covers integration, ODEs, series, and vector geometry.
Offering recorded · Fall 2026
The course is difficult, requiring significant time for homework and textbook reading, with exams heavily weighted and often drawn from previous assignments.
Introduction to calculus of functions of several variables, covering parameterized curves, derivatives, multiple integrals, and vector calculus.
Offering recorded · Fall 2026
Historical reviews of Alexander Hanhart, Joel Robbin, Mikhail Feldman: Alexander Hanhart assigns time-consuming homework, while Mikhail Feldman's quizzes are comically hard despite exams matching the textbook. Joel Robbin also gives long assignments.
Covers first and second semester calculus material while teaching math majors to write and understand proofs.
Offering recorded · Fall 2026
Some students report that homework and exams are difficult, requiring memorization of proofs from notes rather than independent thinking. They criticize the lack of introductory proof instruction and contradictory materials.