Spring 2027

Field Practice and Integrative Seminar III

Field Practice and Integrative Seminar III is an approved advanced practice social work field seminar and placement.

no offering record for this termCredits unavailable
Recorded instructors · Spring 2027 No instructors listed

Summary

1 / 3

Recent recorded grades — Fall 2023: 3.92 GPA, 97.6% A/AB (n=82 letter grades); Fall 2024: 3.93 GPA, 99.1% A/AB (n=111 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.97 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=99 letter grades).

What you’ll be able to do

  • Employ ethical reasoning and decision-making, including appropriate use of consultation and supervision, in problem solving with individuals, families, groups, communities, and organizations.

  • Engage in critical self-reflection to examine boundaries, personal and professional needs, implicit biases, and the impact of power, positionality, status, privilege, and oppression in their social work practice.

  • Uphold the code of ethics and values of the profession through respectful communication, productive conflict resolution, reliable and responsible work ethic, ethical use of technology, and strong interpersonal skills that foster effective relationships with clients, supervisors, and other professionals.

  • Draw on intersectional and anti-oppressive critical theories to analyze underlying social and organizational structures and oppressive forces that deny universal human rights and shape inequities across the lifespan.

  • Develop and implement strategies to advocate for extending human rights in direct practice, in organizational practice, and/or in social change.

  • Can describe the extent to which our society’s structures and values oppress, marginalize, alienate, create, and/or enhance privilege and power and address their own internalized prejudices and biases.

  • Identify, evaluate, and address detrimental aspects of systems and environments with targeted populations, work to change policies and practices which by design or default, perpetuate inequities using strength-based, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive perspectives.

  • Co-create with families, individuals, organizations, and communities, interventions and plans for advocacy that focus on equity and social justice and support those constituents' goals and aspirations.

  • Translate practice and policy issues into researchable questions, processes, and outcomes.

  • Translate research findings into more effective practice and policy.

  • Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses in existing evidence-based research to draw conclusions relevant to social work practice at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels.

  • Understand how international, national, local, and organizational policies shape services, rights, and well-being of individuals, families, and communities.

  • Drawing on community engagement and input, critically analyze policies that are limiting the rights and well-being of the individuals, families, and communities they work with.

  • Develop and contribute to the improvement of policy to extend well-being, social justice, and human rights.

  • Demonstrate a range of interpersonal engagement skills, including warmth, empathy, and genuineness, to engage in culturally responsive practice with individuals, families, groups, communities, and organizations.

  • Engage in effective interprofessional collaboration and consultation through advocacy, interprofessional communication, flexibility, role responsibility, and accountability with various stakeholders.

  • Employ self-reflection and consultation to identify and critically evaluate how positionality, power, privilege, personal experiences and values, and oppression may impact the working relationship and apply this knowledge to facilitate effective engagement with varied clients and constituencies.

  • Enhance and expand on basic assessment strategies by drawing on diverse theories and demonstrating ability to use assessment to inform interventions with individuals, families, groups, communities and organizations.

  • Employ multiple assessment tools and skills with individuals, families, groups, communities, and organizations at the micro, mezzo, and macro levels.

  • Synthesize assessment findings, client input, system-level analysis, and critical reflection to inform intervention plans.

  • Employ self-reflection and consultation to identify and critically evaluate how positionality, power, privilege, oppression, and personal experiences and values may impact the assessment interpretation and apply this knowledge to facilitate effective assessment with varied clients and constituencies.

  • Use critical thinking skills, client and interprofessional collaboration, and a strengths-based perspective to plan, evaluate, and adapt a variety of models of intervention with individuals, families, groups, communities, and organizations.

  • Demonstrate effective use of advocacy as an intervention skill.

  • Employ self-reflection and consultation to identify and critically evaluate how positionality, power, privilege, personal experiences and values, and oppression may impact interventions and apply this knowledge to facilitate effective intervention with varied clients and constituencies.

  • Use a systematic and transparent approach to design and analyze evaluation plans.

  • Collaborate with all stakeholders in planning and implementing evaluation, interpreting evaluation data, and disseminating and applying findings.

  • Complete necessary steps and documentation in activity or project development and transfer responsibility for ongoing sustainability.

  • Employ self-reflection and consultation to identify and critically evaluate how positionality, power, privilege, personal experiences and values, and oppression may impact the evaluation process and apply this knowledge to facilitate effective evaluation with varied clients and constituencies.

Source: UW Guide

Grade history

↗
average GPA
letter grades
A
AB
B
BC
C
D
F

All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors

Prerequisites

Course map

Graduate/professional standing and SOC WORK 401, or Declared in Social Work Advanced Standing MSW

SOCWORK 800 used by

“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.

Prerequisite text tree

Professors

Spring 2027

No instructors recorded for this selection.

Historical instructors & teaching patterns

Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

Calendar & sections

Spring 2027

Schedule loads here as you scroll.

SectionModeEnrolled / capacityWaitlist

Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.

Meeting source records

Student experience

the class

Recent recorded grades — Fall 2023: 3.92 GPA, 97.6% A/AB (n=82 letter grades); Fall 2024: 3.93 GPA, 99.1% A/AB (n=111 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.97 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=99 letter grades).

difficulty & workload

No workload feedback recorded.

Topics

  • Advanced practice social work field seminar and placement
  • Intersectional and anti-oppressive critical theories
  • Policy analysis at international, national, local, and organizational levels
  • Interprofessional collaboration and consultation

Skills

  • Ethical reasoning and decision-making in problem solving
  • Critical self-reflection on bias, power, and positionality
  • Analysis of social structures using intersectional and anti-oppressive theories
  • Advanced assessment strategies to inform interventions
  • Designing and analyzing evaluation plans

Grades

Latest available · Fall 2025— not enough history to project Spring 2027.

average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor

Grade distribution · % of letter grades

A
AB
B
BC
C
D
F

Grades over time

Through Fall 2025

More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data

Where this course fits relative to

Latest available grades · Fall 2025 · all course levels

GPA

Higher than % of other courses in this group.

Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range

letter grades

More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.

Typical course in this group: letter grades.

About this comparison

1316 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.

Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.

Sources & history

UW–Madison

Catalog & offerings

Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.

Catalog observation history

Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.

Selected offering source records

No offering records for the selected term.

Raw records
[]
Rate My Professors

Student reviews

Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.

Read original reviews

No records available.

Madgrades

Grade history

Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.

Explore recorded grades
Model outputs & technical records
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces

Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.

Model & dataset provenance
{
  "model": "Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B",
  "model_revision": "1d4bf0f2ff6012fd82039f2fa52739d0dd7c60c0",
  "task_version": "17",
  "output_id": "b609225027c8991f1205a87a38270c4c883f2c13899cc10f8fc4a488238803f5",
  "requirements_status": "needs_review",
  "dataset_revision": "fc1811fa52e581ea57a35c0cf3343f8740a8ffbf",
  "observed_at": "2026-10-14 17:50:09.728220+00:00"
}