General Physics is an introductory non-calculus course covering mechanics, heat, and waves, with applications to various fields including the life sciences.
Exams were described as tough because no points were awarded for showing work. Students indicated that if they could complete quizzes and homework on their own, they would likely do well in the class.
What you’ll be able to do
Describe an object's motion using position, velocity, acceleration. Predict changes in motion using kinematic equations.
Sum forces on an object (mathematically and graphically) to solve for equilibrium and/or predict the object’s acceleration and motion using Newton's laws.
Predict changes in motion of multi-object systems using conserved quantities (e.g. momentum, energy).
Describe the periodic (repeating) phenomena using amplitude, frequency, period, and wavelength to predict system behavior.
Calculate equilibrium pressure, velocity, and flow rate fluids using Newton's laws and conservation principles.
Determine physical properties of gases using the ideal gas law and principles of heat transfer. Calculate changes in work, heat, and energy resulting from thermodynamic processes and heat engines.
Design and analyze laboratory experiments using concepts from this course.
Connect concepts from this course to underlying physical phenomena in other fields, particularly the life sciences.
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 3.59/5 from 29
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 3.4/5 raw quality · 3.0/5 difficulty · 5
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Benjamin Spike
Benjamin Spike’s lectures were described as clear and concise by some, but monotone or confusing by others. Students noted he was kind and fair, though the class structure was sometimes disorganized with poor communication about grades. Exams were generally difficult, with one reviewer noting that showing work did not earn points. Several students recommended using the help desk, pre-class videos, or PLCs to succeed in the course.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2024: 3.08 GPA, 43.2% A/AB (n=405 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.05 GPA, 44.0% A/AB (n=423 letter grades); Spring 2026: 2.95 GPA, 36.6% A/AB (n=456 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Raw average: 2.53/5 from 182
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 2.0/5 raw quality · 5.0/5 difficulty · 1
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Yibin Pan
Yibin Pan was described as hard to understand and not good at explaining the material, leading one student to suggest taking the course with someone else. Exams consisted of 20 multiple choice questions that were reported to be hard to finish in time.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2016: 3.04 GPA, 43.0% A/AB (n=668 letter grades); Fall 2017: 3.04 GPA, 44.0% A/AB (n=686 letter grades); Fall 2019: 3.12 GPA, 45.2% A/AB (n=657 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Albrecht Karle, Mitch McNanna
Albrecht Karle’s lectures were described as confusing and mumbled, with students learning primarily from pre-lecture videos and TAs. Mitch McNanna was praised for making the course easy to understand and for his genuine care in wanting students to succeed, with one student stating they would take another physics course just to have him as a professor.
ALBRECHT KARLE is recorded teaching in Fall 2021, Fall 2022, Fall 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
BENJAMIN SPIKE is recorded teaching in Spring 2019, Spring 2020, Spring 2022, Spring 2023, Spring 2024, Spring 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
DANIEL THURS is recorded teaching in Spring 2015, Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Fall 2022, Fall 2023, Fall 2024, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
LAWRENCE WATSON is recorded teaching in Spring 2014. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
PETER TIMBIE is recorded teaching in Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018, Spring 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
VICTOR BRAR is recorded teaching in Fall 2017, Fall 2019, Fall 2020, Spring 2022, Fall 2023, Spring 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
WESLEY SMITH is recorded teaching in Fall 2006, Fall 2007, Fall 2010, Fall 2011, Fall 2012, Fall 2013, Fall 2014, Fall 2015, Fall 2016, Fall 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
YIBIN PAN is recorded teaching in Spring 2010, Fall 2016, Fall 2017, Fall 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 260
0
DIS 303
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 306
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 307
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 308
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 310
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 313
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 314
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 603
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 606
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 607
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 608
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 610
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 613
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 614
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 311
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 611
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
0 / 260
0
DIS 318
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 319
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 320
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 618
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 619
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 620
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 309
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 609
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 304
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 604
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 312
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 612
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 315
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 615
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 321
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 621
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 322
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 622
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 317
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 617
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 323
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 623
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 324
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 624
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
LAB 633
Classroom Instruction
0 / 0
0
DIS 333
Classroom Instruction
0 / 0
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Students had mixed opinions on Benjamin Spike's teaching style, with some describing his lectures as monotone while others found him straightforward and effective. One student noted that discussion TAs and pre-class videos did most of the teaching in the course.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.05 GPA, 44.0% A/AB (n=423 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.09 GPA, 44.6% A/AB (n=691 letter grades); Spring 2026: 2.95 GPA, 36.6% A/AB (n=456 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Benjamin Spike
Exams were described as tough because no points were awarded for showing work. Students indicated that if they could complete quizzes and homework on their own, they would likely do well in the class.
Past student reviews · Benjamin Spike
Some students complained about poor communication regarding grades and a disorganized class structure. Others reported that the instructor often disappeared for weeks, leaving Piazza questions unanswered, which was frustrating.
Topics
Mechanics, heat, and waves
Applications to life sciences
Fluid dynamics
Skills
Predict motion using kinematic equations
Apply Newton's laws to solve force problems
Use conservation of momentum and energy
Analyze thermodynamic processes and heat engines
Design and analyze laboratory experiments
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.812.81–3.243.24average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.08 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
2.952.95GPA
Higher than 44% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
456456letter grades
More recorded grades than 9696% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.