Culturally Responsive Science Communication

Analyzes inequities in science communication and explores approaches to increase equity and cultural competence. Engages with professionals and communities in health, agriculture, and environmental contexts.

no offering record for this termCredits unavailable
Recorded instructors · Spring 2027 No instructors listed

Summary

1 / 3

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2024: 4.00 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=12 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.97 GPA, 96.7% A/AB (n=30 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.96 GPA, 97.6% A/AB (n=41 letter grades).

What you’ll be able to do

  • Identify historic societal injustices related to science and science communication

  • Apply co-creation and participatory approaches to engage diverse communities in science-related topics

  • Consider civic and social responsibilities to engage diverse groups in science

  • Evaluate different approaches for communicating science more effectively to underrepresented, marginalized and other communities

  • Evaluate the cultural responsiveness of science communication and offer recommendations for how to create science communication that is more culturally responsive and culturally sustaining

  • Work as part of a team to create culturally responsive science communication for real-world project

  • Create culturally responsive science communication as part of group project

  • Independently design a graduate-level research prospectus related to examining a culturally responsive science communication context for a marginalized group in the U.S. related to your interests and research program

Source: UW Guide

Grade history

↗
average GPA
letter grades
A
AB
B
BC
C
D
F

All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors

Prerequisites

Course map

Satisfied Communications A or graduate/professional standing

  • Satisfied Communications A or graduate/professional standing
LSC 480

This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.

Prerequisite text tree
  • Satisfied Communications A or graduate/professional standing

Professors

Spring 2027

No instructors recorded for this selection.

Historical instructors & teaching patterns

Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

Calendar & sections

Spring 2027

Schedule loads here as you scroll.

SectionModeEnrolled / capacityWaitlist

Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.

Meeting source records

No records available.

Student experience

the class

Recent recorded grades — Spring 2024: 4.00 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=12 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.97 GPA, 96.7% A/AB (n=30 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.96 GPA, 97.6% A/AB (n=41 letter grades).

difficulty & workload

No workload feedback recorded.

Topics

  • Inequities and historic societal injustices in science communication
  • Participatory research methods and community co-creation approaches
  • Applications in health, agriculture, and environmental science communication

Skills

  • Participatory research methods and community-centered science communication design
  • Evaluating and designing culturally responsive science communication strategies
  • Designing graduate-level research prospectuses on culturally responsive science communication

Grades

Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Spring 2027.

average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor

Grade distribution · % of letter grades

A
AB
B
BC
C
D
F

Grades over time

Through Spring 2026

More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data

Where this course fits relative to

Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels

GPA

Higher than % of other courses in this group.

Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range

letter grades

More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.

Typical course in this group: letter grades.

About this comparison

1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.

Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.

Sources & history

UW–Madison

Catalog & offerings

Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.

Catalog observation history

Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.

Selected offering source records

No offering records for the selected term.

Raw records
[]
Rate My Professors

Student reviews

Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.

Read original reviews

No records available.

Madgrades

Grade history

Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.

Explore recorded grades
Model outputs & technical records
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces

Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.

Model & dataset provenance
{
  "model": "Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B",
  "model_revision": "1d4bf0f2ff6012fd82039f2fa52739d0dd7c60c0",
  "task_version": "17",
  "output_id": "06eeea21fcc3224c9e357308183bfecb9b669cc0b81543512ce8127231a05156",
  "requirements_status": "needs_review",
  "dataset_revision": "fc1811fa52e581ea57a35c0cf3343f8740a8ffbf",
  "observed_at": "2026-10-14 17:50:09.728220+00:00"
}