Intellectual Freedom
LEGALST/LIS 645 examines intellectual freedom, censorship, and constitutional rights in the context of information access.
Summary
Historical reviews of Anuj Desai: The course involves heavy weekly reading loads and relies significantly on participation, which accounts for 40% of the grade in a two-and-a-half-hour discussion format.
Grade history
↗letter grades
All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors
Prerequisites
Course mapJunior standing
- Junior standing
This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Prerequisite text tree
- Junior standing
Professors
Fall 2026No instructors recorded for this selection.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews of Anuj Desai: Anuj Desai receives polarized reviews regarding his teaching style. One reviewer found him disorganized and rambling, while another praised his passion and engagement. Both noted the heavy reliance on weekly readings and class participation.
ANUJ DESAI is recorded teaching in Spring 2008, Spring 2009, Fall 2010, Spring 2013, Spring 2014, Fall 2014, Fall 2017, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Fall 2020, Fall 2023, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026Schedule loads here as you scroll.
| Section | Mode | Enrolled / capacity | Waitlist |
|---|
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.
Meeting source records
No records available.
Student experience
the class
Historical reviews of Anuj Desai: Reviews of Anuj Desai present conflicting experiences, ranging from a disorganized, boring class with unclear expectations to an engaging, passionate course with improving readings.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2020: 3.69 GPA, 75.0% A/AB (n=8 letter grades); Fall 2023: 3.38 GPA, 84.6% A/AB (n=26 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.50 GPA, 78.9% A/AB (n=19 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviews of Anuj Desai: The course involves heavy weekly reading loads and relies significantly on participation, which accounts for 40% of the grade in a two-and-a-half-hour discussion format.
Historical reviews of Anuj Desai: Students report frustration with unclear term paper expectations and inefficient lectures, while others find the professor highly motivated and the discussion-based format rewarding.
Topics
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Not enough comparable courses for Fall 2026 in UW–Madison.
Sources & history
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.
Selected offering source records
No offering records for the selected term.
Raw records
[]
Student reviews
Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.
Read original reviews
Grade history
Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.
Explore recorded gradesModel outputs & technical records
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces
Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.
Model & dataset provenance
{
"model": "nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4",
"model_revision": "1355db6a052410cfd62085d94b58866fd0f2c3c5",
"task_version": "14",
"output_id": "dacb1678d27c4934a175db23d8e7e3c167b84beeee5a281581372d4d332ac3f4",
"requirements_status": "valid",
"dataset_revision": "e243353dcb7d79b7247ced91d69443ef4c2a6349",
"observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00"
}