Data Management and Analysis for Industrial Engineers
Covers fundamentals of data management and analysis for industrial engineers, including database strategies, preprocessing, visualization, and modeling using MySQL and R.
Tina Xu's homework was similar to in-class problems, and the group project was relatively easy. One student found exams decently hard, while another said tests were not that hard.
What you’ll be able to do
Demonstrate knowledge of fundamental industrial database management strategies
Apply data preprocessing, visualization, and modeling techniques
Apply industrial database management techniques using structured query language (SQL)
Use leading programming software to perform data regression analysis
Create and solve a real-life industrial data analytics problem, and present results effectively to audience
Raw average: 2.38/5 from 13
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 2.5/5 raw quality · 2.5/5 difficulty · 4
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Tina Xu
Students found Tina Xu’s lectures boring and repetitive, often describing them as monotone slide readings. While several reviewers noted that homework was similar to in-class problems and that attendance earned extra credit, opinions on exam difficulty varied; some found them manageable, while others described them as decently hard with low preparation guidance.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 48
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Tina Xu's lectures were described as boring, with slides being read in a monotone voice. The same student reported that exams and homework were not too hard.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.72 GPA, 86.0% A/AB (n=57 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.64 GPA, 79.7% A/AB (n=69 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.68 GPA, 78.7% A/AB (n=47 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Tina Xu
Tina Xu's homework was similar to in-class problems, and the group project was relatively easy. One student found exams decently hard, while another said tests were not that hard.
Past student reviews · Tina Xu
Tina Xu offered extra credit for attendance and excused one late homework submission after a time mix-up. She graded projects and homework easily, though exam and project expectations were unclear.
Topics
Database management, data preprocessing, visualization, and modeling
Solving real industrial engineering problems
Programming with MySQL and R
Skills
Industrial database management strategies
Data preprocessing, visualization, and modeling
Database management using SQL
Data regression analysis using programming software
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Spring 2027.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A61.7%61.7%
AB17.0%17.0%
B17.0%17.0%
BC4.3%4.3%
C0.0%0.0%
D0.0%0.0%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.683.68GPA
Higher than 4848% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
4747letter grades
More recorded grades than 3232% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.