Digital Engineering Laboratory covers practical computer system design, including designing, constructing, testing, and programming pipelined digital computers and significant digital subsystems.
Raw average: 3.83/5 from 40
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
No course-specific feedback yet.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 20
0
LAB 301
Classroom Instruction
0 / 20
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
A former instructor relied on recycled slides and taught spontaneously, often failing to explain expectations clearly.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2024: 3.86 GPA, 90.9% A/AB (n=11 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.61 GPA, 77.3% A/AB (n=22 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.86 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=38 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Parmesh Ramanathan
Students reported that answering simple yes/no questions took up to 30 minutes, contributing to a frustrating in-class experience.
Past student reviews · Parmesh Ramanathan
One student found the instructor's feedback on presentations to be very harsh and almost insulting.
Topics
Computer system design
Digital subsystems
Pipelined digital computers
Instruction set architecture (ISA)
Processor design
Skills
Designing, constructing, and programming pipelined digital computers
Designing, constructing, and testing digital subsystems
Specifying novel instruction set architectures
Specifying processor designs for novel ISAs
Developing, verifying, and demonstrating processor prototypes
Collaborating in moderate-sized teams
Communicating project status and results orally and in writing
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Spring 2027.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A71.1%71.1%
AB28.9%28.9%
B0.0%0.0%
BC0.0%0.0%
C0.0%0.0%
D0.0%0.0%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.863.86GPA
Higher than 7272% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
3838letter grades
More recorded grades than 1616% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.