Raw average: 4.26/5 from 42 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 4.5/5 raw quality · 3.0/5 difficulty · 2
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Joseph Krachey is described as helpful, clear, and caring about the course's value to students. Reviewers note his accessibility and support throughout the semester, though one mentions administrative delays in ordering components.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.76 GPA, 88.9% A/AB (n=36 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.88 GPA, 94.4% A/AB (n=36 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.83 GPA, 92.7% A/AB (n=41 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
No reviews exist for current instructor Joseph Krachey. Historical reviews for Michael Morrow describe him as an industry professional who teaches material well and provides helpful office hours. Reviewers found his lectures entertaining and valuable for real-world engineering context.
JOSEPH KRACHEY is recorded teaching in Spring 2011, Spring 2012, Spring 2013, Spring 2014, Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Spring 2020, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MICHAEL MORROW is recorded teaching in Spring 2007, Spring 2008, Spring 2009, Spring 2010. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
36 / 30
2
LAB 301
Classroom Instruction
10 / 40
0
LAB 302
Classroom Instruction
26 / 40
2
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Joseph Krachey is a helpful and clear instructor who cares about the course's value, though the class is hard and requires early, consistent work.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.76 GPA, 88.9% A/AB (n=36 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.88 GPA, 94.4% A/AB (n=36 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.83 GPA, 92.7% A/AB (n=41 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
The course is hard but rewarding, requiring students to work early and often, and to order components immediately due to potential payment delays.
Students find the class rewarding and recommend it, but note that administrative payment hurdles can cause significant delays in receiving necessary components.
Topics
Microprocessor-based embedded systems.
Design process.
Team design project.
Skills
Hardware and software design for embedded systems.
Study of the design process.
Team-based design project execution.
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A78.0%78.0%
AB14.6%14.6%
B2.4%2.4%
BC4.9%4.9%
C0.0%0.0%
D0.0%0.0%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.833.83GPA
Higher than 6767% of other courses
in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
4141letter grades
More recorded grades than 2323% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30
recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded
grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.