Design Thinking for Transformation teaches techniques for creative analysis and problem solving, applied to human-centered design challenges through prototyping and testing real-world projects.
Raw average: 5.00/5 from 4
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 5.0/5 raw quality · 1.5/5 difficulty · 2
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Samuel Dennis
Students described Samuel Dennis as an incredibly understanding and easy grader who made the course an easy A, provided attendance was maintained. The class relied heavily on group work and did not require purchasing any textbooks.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.77 GPA, 88.5% A/AB (n=26 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.74 GPA, 93.5% A/AB (n=31 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.69 GPA, 91.7% A/AB (n=36 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Lesley Sager
One student noted Lesley Sager had a passion for the material but dropped the class because she felt uncomfortable and left out. The reviewer claimed they were picked on despite paying attention.
LESLEY SAGER is recorded teaching in Fall 2018, Fall 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022, Spring 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SAMUEL DENNIS JR is recorded teaching in Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 40
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
0 / 50
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Students described Professor Dennis as incredibly understanding and an easy grader who made the course accessible.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.77 GPA, 88.5% A/AB (n=26 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.66 GPA, 83.6% A/AB (n=61 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.69 GPA, 91.7% A/AB (n=36 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Samuel Dennis
Attendance was somewhat mandatory and the class relied entirely on group work, but no textbooks were required.
Past student reviews · Samuel Dennis
A non-design major found the teaching high quality, rating it the best professor experience at UW-Madison.
Topics
Design thinking techniques
Human-centered design challenges
Everyday situation improvements and community issues
Skills
Design thinking techniques for creative analysis and problem solving
Applying design techniques to human-centered design challenges
Innovating, prototyping, and testing designs under real-world constraints
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Spring 2027.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A52.8%52.8%
AB38.9%38.9%
B2.8%2.8%
BC5.6%5.6%
C0.0%0.0%
D0.0%0.0%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.693.69GPA
Higher than 5050% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
3636letter grades
More recorded grades than 1111% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.