Introduction to Data Science programming using Python with no prior experience required, emphasizing analysis of real datasets and visual communication.
Projects were extremely time-consuming and often repetitive, but students appreciated that the grade was largely based on their completion rather than just exams.
What you’ll be able to do
Integrate foundational concepts and tools from mathematics, computer science and statistics to solve data science problems
Demonstrate competencies with tools and processes necessary for data management and reproducibility
Produce meaning from data employing modeling strategies
Demonstrate critical thinking related to data science concepts and methods
Demonstrate oral, written and visual communication skills related to data science
Manipulate quantitative information to create models, and/or devise solutions to problems using multi-step arguments, based on and supported by quantitative information
Satisfied Quantitative Reasoning (QR) A or declared in the Professional Capstone Program in Computer Sciences. Not open to students with credit for COMP SCI 301.
Satisfied Quantitative Reasoning (QR) A
declared in the Professional Capstone Program in Computer Sciences
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Prerequisite text tree
All of
Any of
Satisfied Quantitative Reasoning (QR) A
declared in the Professional Capstone Program in Computer Sciences
Raw average: 3.74/5 from 23
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Raw average: 3.48/5 from 89
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 4.2/5 raw quality · 3.1/5 difficulty · 49
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Michael Doescher
Michael Doescher taught a project-heavy course in which projects were time-consuming, and one student also found them repetitive. He live-coded during lectures, which some found engaging, though another student said lectures did not help because he spent time on unrelated content.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.27 GPA, 57.4% A/AB (n=749 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.36 GPA, 63.0% A/AB (n=915 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.43 GPA, 70.5% A/AB (n=755 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Meenakshi Syamkumar, Andrew Kuemmel
A student reported that Meenakshi Syamkumar moved quickly through lectures, sent over 14 emails weekly, and enforced harsh grading where a 95% was required for an A. Another student found Andrew Kuemmel's course poorly designed with overlapping deadlines, noting that grading varied by TA and that Kuemmel was strict about minor details.
ANDREW KUEMMEL is recorded teaching in Fall 2021, Spring 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
GURMAIL SINGH is recorded teaching in Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
LOUIS OLIPHANT is recorded teaching in Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MEENAKSHI SYAMKUMAR is recorded teaching in Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MICHAEL DOESCHER is recorded teaching in Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
PEYMAN MORTEZA is recorded teaching in Fall 2021. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
0 / 235
0
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 235
0
LEC 003
Classroom Instruction
0 / 235
0
LEC 004
Classroom Instruction
0 / 235
0
LAB 311
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 312
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 313
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 321
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 322
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 323
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 331
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 343
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 341
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 342
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 332
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
LAB 333
Classroom Instruction
0 / 75
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Michael Doescher was an extremely engaging lecturer with his live coding, making the class enjoyable even for students with no prior coding experience.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.27 GPA, 57.4% A/AB (n=749 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.36 GPA, 63.0% A/AB (n=915 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.43 GPA, 70.5% A/AB (n=755 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Michael Doescher
Projects were extremely time-consuming and often repetitive, but students appreciated that the grade was largely based on their completion rather than just exams.
Past student reviews · Michael Doescher
Attending office hours was crucial to succeed in the class.
Topics
Data Science programming with Python
Analysis of real datasets
Visual communication
Skills
Data Science programming in Python
Analyzing real datasets
Visual communication
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
3.073.07–3.653.65average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
5 earlier forecasts · 0.16 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.433.43GPA
Higher than 2525% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
755755letter grades
More recorded grades than 9999% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.