Recent recorded grades — Fall 2023: 2.24 GPA, 6.5% A/AB (n=31 letter grades); Fall 2024: 2.67 GPA, 6.4% A/AB (n=47 letter grades); Fall 2025: 2.32 GPA, 13.6% A/AB (n=44 letter grades).
Engineering Principles for Biological Systems
Applies basic engineering principles like mass/energy balances and fluid flow to agricultural and biological systems.
Summary
Historical reviews of Jessica Drewry, Troy Runge: Runge's homework requires EES software and can be challenging, though exams are often considered manageable with practice. Drewry's course was rated difficult, with students finding her lectures hard to follow.
Grade history
↗letter grades
All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors
Prerequisites
Course mapMATH 217 or 221
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Prerequisite text tree
- Any of
- MATH 221
- MATH 217
Professors
Fall 2026Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews for Troy Runge describe him as approachable and helpful, though some note his lectures can be disorganized or unhelpful. Students report that exams are fair and often easier than homework, with some being take-home. One review notes he can make students feel dumb, while others praise his passion and availability.
JESSICA DREWRY is recorded teaching in Fall 2018, Fall 2019. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ROBERT ANEX is recorded teaching in Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Fall 2022, Fall 2023, Fall 2024, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
TROY RUNGE is recorded teaching in Fall 2012, Fall 2013, Fall 2014, Fall 2015, Fall 2016, Fall 2017. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026Schedule loads here as you scroll.
| Section | Mode | Enrolled / capacity | Waitlist |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEC 001 | Classroom Instruction | 58 / 65 | 0 |
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Meeting source records
Student experience
the class
Historical reviews for Troy Runge describe a supportive instructor with fair exams, though some note disorganized lectures. Historical reviews for Jessica Drewry show polarized feedback, with most citing unprofessionalism while one found her approachable.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2023: 2.24 GPA, 6.5% A/AB (n=31 letter grades); Fall 2024: 2.67 GPA, 6.4% A/AB (n=47 letter grades); Fall 2025: 2.32 GPA, 13.6% A/AB (n=44 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviews of Jessica Drewry, Troy Runge: Runge's homework requires EES software and can be challenging, though exams are often considered manageable with practice. Drewry's course was rated difficult, with students finding her lectures hard to follow.
Historical reviews of Jessica Drewry, Troy Runge: Runge's students value his extra credit and office hours but report needing to learn material independently. Drewry's lectures were frequently criticized as confusing, though one student appreciated her willingness to clarify concepts.
Topics
Skills
Grades
Latest available · Fall 2025— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
Grades over time
Through Fall 2025
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Fall 2025 · all course levels
GPA
Higher than % of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
letter grades
More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: letter grades.
About this comparison
1320 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.
Selected offering source records
Engineering Principles for Biological Systems
Recorded 2026-09-07Raw records
[
{
"run_id": "20260907T155543-ce3781c4",
"semester": "1272",
"observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00",
"offering_id": "1272:112:000476",
"course_id": "BSE 249",
"course_uid": "course_c3456a6976e4f7f36ddc6600",
"term_id": "1272",
"source_course_id": "000476",
"source_subject_id": "112",
"title": "Engineering Principles for Biological Systems",
"credits_min": 3,
"credits_max": 3,
"typically_offered": "Fall"
}
]Student reviews
Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.
Read original reviews
Grade history
Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.
Explore recorded gradesModel outputs & technical records
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces
Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.
Model & dataset provenance
{
"model": "nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4",
"model_revision": "1355db6a052410cfd62085d94b58866fd0f2c3c5",
"task_version": "14",
"output_id": "f9d9b27bd728cc94d75b8537391653e4e45b69fa5b6e4e2d85823d196556c720",
"requirements_status": "needs_review",
"dataset_revision": "e243353dcb7d79b7247ced91d69443ef4c2a6349",
"observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00"
}