World Archaeology introduces the ancient world, tracing human culture from its origins to the start of written history through archaeological research at global sites.
Students completed assigned readings and watched videos that were required to do well on exams. While some materials were lengthy, others were described as short and manageable.
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 4.56/5 from 39
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 4.3/5 raw quality · 2.3/5 difficulty · 4
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Sarah Clayton
Sarah Clayton taught engaging, short lectures that students found exciting and relatable, though opinions varied on the assigned videos and readings. While one student felt the videos were less helpful than a direct lecture, another described the short readings as doable and central to the exam. Overall, reviewers characterized her as a knowledgeable professor who cared about her students.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2019: 3.18 GPA, 49.0% A/AB (n=147 letter grades); Spring 2022: 3.48 GPA, 70.5% A/AB (n=149 letter grades); Fall 2024: 3.31 GPA, 61.4% A/AB (n=153 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Jonathan Kenoyer, Sissel Schroeder
Jonathan Kenoyer’s slides contained dense information, making note-taking difficult, so students relied on condensed PDFs and discussions. Sissel Schroeder provided a note sheet for online lectures that helped with exams, and she was organized and easy to follow, though her material was described as semi-boring.
HENRY BUNN is recorded teaching in Fall 2012, Fall 2015, Spring 2016, Spring 2018, Fall 2023, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JASON YAEGER is recorded teaching in Fall 2007, Spring 2010. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JONATHAN KENOYER is recorded teaching in Spring 2008, Spring 2009, Spring 2010, Fall 2010, Spring 2011, Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013, Spring 2015, Fall 2015, Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2020, Fall 2022, Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SARAH CLAYTON is recorded teaching in Spring 2011, Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2012, Spring 2013, Fall 2014, Fall 2015, Spring 2016, Fall 2017, Fall 2019, Spring 2022, Fall 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SISSEL SCHROEDER is recorded teaching in Spring 2007, Fall 2009, Spring 2010, Fall 2011, Fall 2012, Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Fall 2016, Spring 2019, Fall 2021, Spring 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 160
0
DIS 301
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 303
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 305
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 308
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 302
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 304
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 306
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
DIS 307
Classroom Instruction
0 / 22
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Sarah Clayton’s lectures were described as exciting and engaging, making it easy for students to pay attention. Her enthusiasm for the material was a key part of the positive experience.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.20 GPA, 56.5% A/AB (n=62 letter grades); Fall 2025: 2.97 GPA, 41.0% A/AB (n=134 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.07 GPA, 47.7% A/AB (n=65 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Sarah Clayton
Students completed assigned readings and watched videos that were required to do well on exams. While some materials were lengthy, others were described as short and manageable.
Past student reviews · Sarah Clayton
One student felt that the heavy reliance on videos was less helpful than a direct lecture, particularly because the video content appeared on the test.
Topics
Origins of human culture and the transition to written history.
Archaeological research at major global sites and ruins.
Archaeological concepts and techniques for understanding human diversity.
Skills
Archaeological analysis of sites to understand human cultural diversity and its present-day implications.
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.692.69–3.743.74average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.22 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.073.07GPA
Higher than 77% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
6565letter grades
More recorded grades than 4848% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.