[{"run_id":"20260906T231458-5fdd2fff","semester":"1272","observed_at":"2026-09-06 23:14:58.172943+00:00","record_version_id":"fed97efe9b4a36812f819c146a61d770e28df73ba24ae694e7d39192d0435425","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"20260907T155543-ce3781c4","semester":"1272","observed_at":"2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00","record_version_id":"fed97efe9b4a36812f819c146a61d770e28df73ba24ae694e7d39192d0435425","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"20261014T203208-0851c9a1","semester":"1274","observed_at":"2026-10-14 17:50:09.728220+00:00","record_version_id":"3cd07f07d728bebda622644ce7d87b454babbd042e160c64eb0bee6103fd3ca8","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"22eab91f814e37f6fa9e07dedcef98d49892f76bf8316dd180e792a31fc9718e","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[{\"catalog_year\":\"2026-2027\",\"observed_at\":\"2026-10-14T17:51:03.625248+00:00\",\"source\":\"catalog\",\"source_url\":\"https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/poli_sci/\",\"term\":null,\"text\":\"Demonstrate a critical understanding of the Civil Military Paradox and the complex web of relationships that link the American public, civil authority, and the U.S. armed forces. Articulate an appreciation for why the paradox and civil-military relationships are important.\"},{\"catalog_year\":\"2026-2027\",\"observed_at\":\"2026-10-14T17:51:03.625248+00:00\",\"source\":\"catalog\",\"source_url\":\"https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/poli_sci/\",\"term\":null,\"text\":\"Demonstrate how civil-military relations (CMR) impact our personal, professional, and civic lives.\"},{\"catalog_year\":\"2026-2027\",\"observed_at\":\"2026-10-14T17:51:03.625248+00:00\",\"source\":\"catalog\",\"source_url\":\"https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/poli_sci/\",\"term\":null,\"text\":\"Comprehend and apply the vocabulary and theoretical concepts that inform our understanding of civil-military relations.\"},{\"catalog_year\":\"2026-2027\",\"observed_at\":\"2026-10-14T17:51:03.625248+00:00\",\"source\":\"catalog\",\"source_url\":\"https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/poli_sci/\",\"term\":null,\"text\":\"Explain how big ideas, historical experiences, and wider trends shape civil-military relations in the United States. These considerations include:(a.)the U.S. Constitution(b.)national culture (core assumptions, values, and beliefs)(c.) public sentiment(d.)partisan political debates (e.)the domestic and international environments (political, security, economic, social)(f.)issues of equity/inclusion\"},{\"catalog_year\":\"2026-2027\",\"observed_at\":\"2026-10-14T17:51:03.625248+00:00\",\"source\":\"catalog\",\"source_url\":\"https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/poli_sci/\",\"term\":null,\"text\":\"Address critical issues and debates related to civil-military relations in U.S. politics and society—past, present, and future.\"},{\"catalog_year\":\"2026-2027\",\"observed_at\":\"2026-10-14T17:51:03.625248+00:00\",\"source\":\"catalog\",\"source_url\":\"https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/poli_sci/\",\"term\":null,\"text\":\"Demonstrate how to think critically and write effectively. Respond to contemporary civil-military issues by developing recommendations for action. Support these recommendations with properly interpreted evidence and sound argument.\"},{\"catalog_year\":\"2026-2027\",\"observed_at\":\"2026-10-14T17:51:03.625248+00:00\",\"source\":\"catalog\",\"source_url\":\"https://guide.wisc.edu/courses/poli_sci/\",\"term\":null,\"text\":\"Produce research and analysis that deepens our understanding of the issues, theory, and/or practice of civil-military relations\"}]"},{"run_id":"legacy-03b0bbb9723907cf3d1b41cf0bb34837dc398e42","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-04-16 05:20:33.104844+00:00","record_version_id":"6f6c9bdd392805ca200966da01fea721441f74821ca36bcee1707ca4b5ec913c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-0837245627eb714ae6bb0375f7abe8f41042011f","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-04-16 05:20:33.104844+00:00","record_version_id":"6f6c9bdd392805ca200966da01fea721441f74821ca36bcee1707ca4b5ec913c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-08c92e359bbbc110b0778b7e0b15d6f40000e6b1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-21 07:05:14.730696+00:00","record_version_id":"e3d97ff20f022a13f7dbfeb02921c9cddf6cc460930699ddb8bfa897b65d9394","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-0944d76440dc778fbb89626058c10451009ce9c6","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 03:36:18.194118+00:00","record_version_id":"3faf8350c2f079ec06cbdfa0cef8133b9fabec0e357923eec5162b857c596aa9","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-0a7f4bce29c816ef4d3d71b4eb8a2a3e15e33cc1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-18 20:04:02.695444+00:00","record_version_id":"8c286325007891b187978bd54add4b361a8b38063e53d2b912e672f41981b62b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-0ab917f827a7de22ebdc1087114d377a31c4687b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 02:11:02.531191+00:00","record_version_id":"e0bafce1bccaef31d09dd91ce341d2300d15e4d2cb13141519d69af4ae9905d4","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-0c40ecab4b6db9333d1f18aef816e3ee659e300c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 18:02:34.797617+00:00","record_version_id":"94668759e48372a1e84d3d7f3ba7c2bb29ee400817a734432c4cf9072f79c05b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-0cb4d29a588ec7f11c7e00b7cf5dc3a0d23d0349","semester":"1266","observed_at":"2026-01-22 01:00:26.555427+00:00","record_version_id":"1e637bb5cc47423267cc1524cc9d430692aea38bb8514fcb0a328cc4c16e4b6c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-11c30ec39e91498cbfcf3a923c53a4b03e387280","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-20 04:58:26.847117+00:00","record_version_id":"9aaa496984f3cd9c6e416c80283afc92433465db454385d76ae8da3de815fabe","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-13cd500edf2587e9a3428f326253738fbea965ea","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-12-14 04:50:04.653658+00:00","record_version_id":"9524bb13f3653fa7b112112fed812029e4e3ff28d4d24abfae87aa13d6494a61","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-1da08b2de39f05e6bc877c189fc2fd6eeda563f5","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-01 00:03:56.707251+00:00","record_version_id":"bbed2222527780e27d813f1e511a7aa992999eafaf95141a52c228c3fa6132e5","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-2031af47efe133b0e7877f433286ff07385afc41","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-02 20:16:45.749584+00:00","record_version_id":"68875c95dfb77aaca4550a37f93058712669622d8f0e458baac65eacb728fd30","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-238eba6f32fbc30407f616dd0628ff02a2a824dd","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-17 05:15:07.788352+00:00","record_version_id":"db6c115d97a9193c3efab4f6d01dc5f26c145c9497cf87d03a62546af4b06071","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-25f0ff56bc4d80f8a8afa1a0bcce8dae6fddb5e5","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 17:20:25.942090+00:00","record_version_id":"d302dbe7a518335a6ce5dd23780e3a2370b3a5a4504471d61949ddd222b829ba","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-2923f91826ce253b7aeefa9f75b4a39fe4c80ff0","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-10 05:10:25.938416+00:00","record_version_id":"62be59c599b0c3a7956a2d2c55e568197f2ff3c1d814705d07b15efc2bbc421b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-2a05214a4023e0157fa6f7d188c85308f714176c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-09-07 04:56:38.255315+00:00","record_version_id":"1fd8c4b6e5af4f9e1b568c36dd64bd7b215c0eacead7f1abdbe56b390de28615","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-2b1b8e39131de92b94620b25c5bbb25690efed4c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 07:54:53.913454+00:00","record_version_id":"d873179218ac3dea6dcae09d3f501714c7e7c352e2560221f7a18c180f2b1520","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-33a1225644e5a5855d60f66e65413946e72fedf4","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-22 01:52:05.152650+00:00","record_version_id":"037d8470334fb2b0fc9fa3ae59e47bbd12bce513b44f039f7cc1950d6b15f604","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-3b89c83dbf5208e13756184de1f2b2d0c09af35f","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 06:40:10.235522+00:00","record_version_id":"4995951fb364031e07ece77b0216c5b0bdf8909a7c78809b07d8fcdbbd5aa1b9","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-3c3eebf7f35c39364b445a2fa5a112ce28dbb4a1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 17:03:59.062985+00:00","record_version_id":"f6f0521fe87511772c1954f3d3648bf5a6d5ae2630f940efc40d899d906c7b4a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-3fa4dd71391f1c9cf4ab2216680bbc428689f92d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 01:15:58.180530+00:00","record_version_id":"0953667d95366d929b068f78b0487727fd54575d3ecd7e01698f572fd533bd4c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-4040aa216da722a34483f68fc1e129ea571ae08d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 07:27:39.695506+00:00","record_version_id":"1e1a9834bf687cb5c3a04f327e4fac313041e9394d3313c64eb531837ff11523","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-454d53cd690294459f8ad0793cc3ed562060e56c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 01:34:00.536004+00:00","record_version_id":"ef7f8ad85492193b50ba7fb13f0cdd8a1e2e6b4122032cb3917fbbe3cc27d351","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-486f091e051fdb4ccdb80ee7b4fb0a5814510324","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-11-16 05:32:31.273726+00:00","record_version_id":"5c8c9cea7df60a0158fc4bdd4ce639ee98831719f59ece36de42e00e1ca4e879","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-50393cfc5fd5598d4f4731ef1919f2ff53af07d9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 06:05:57.438846+00:00","record_version_id":"c552ed944f20935e4fa1a640afdf10f4d3cf1de077ddd0c835dbabb9a01447e7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-50f6947786b208c800db8bbd0cec84a8f0f187d2","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-02 03:49:42.915428+00:00","record_version_id":"da5e3298d523754926bde4a2ab138c9f120bbaf9f8fdb9b170425d088b72d641","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-51d86ed4082dced3803c295419b0ec8440942016","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-11-12 04:50:41.141307+00:00","record_version_id":"5de0341eaa406fc68797646de87925c1b945506c2de9d916ddc4d025f6f08ac1","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-53101bd1c10db0d00d094e4c9154d4c244ff23d9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-10-05 04:58:05.366968+00:00","record_version_id":"439949288a36ee302aa822eec1b709dc6776a5b4267cc4b360fe6fbaccc4b29e","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-58751151c564e11c5cb8aedd3a2d3527c22f73eb","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 06:59:01.536576+00:00","record_version_id":"be052bd1c50812da79706e951aef69f4661098b74f2cede0a63e3167791cb155","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-5c4c8d3701a333ba4ddadef7d0b5dde8440fcdf0","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 01:57:51.256704+00:00","record_version_id":"f9ea7a8e8d6d10ee61f744811e29f1a0665a8e889c82c624e9b843b40b48190c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-5d20d9f81651d3c83fcaa2fd10870ce6e5d5a685","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 16:48:48.484741+00:00","record_version_id":"2e0995906bb009a0d1be95ff8d99e38c45c86a34ac61c99af571eb44a19ea8a3","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-5feaebf2ab37051c86ad360cc0fa0d7e0e2ea295","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-24 15:58:23.378859+00:00","record_version_id":"0d76d91f3e9fab11d7371aae7276c6fc1f553cbc43627df2aa6a1ba2d365400a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-60949965544fce098cc006354e201149005fb77b","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-10-26 05:07:14.077864+00:00","record_version_id":"e0bde528187e49e3d751f1df360f64b12d37551d5a78f40b405a8700575a3a1c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-639225ac3addf8522f1d30cb4fe26054ea7f8c49","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 08:14:42.497608+00:00","record_version_id":"fd41181cfb2df878ea32929b90c6778e72ce104ab8ccb2c45cb0094a832f74b2","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-64093b17b3a9c67a41aa33eb37adb53ec38df714","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 02:11:02.531191+00:00","record_version_id":"0602c9570b9d330979ddb61ba123595a9e42c68cccd2890092aee74dd5112b2b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-6885b56099f55e08aa0205546369fb0381d50e13","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-13 04:59:22.367394+00:00","record_version_id":"1b47eefc77659e913ff2f81379f360791f9b8a485c8646d8884c7dea7b05030c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-69d4b2b16e8268f75b6390b3a0e2ce8bf73999da","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 03:21:29.925498+00:00","record_version_id":"505cf0e771d14f39e6eb551fe22f1bc39a8416dd6798f0ac900929b140ad5f75","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-6b29c3e0673b2f9a736d2363db5409e03d5b3ed4","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-12-03 12:33:41.418072+00:00","record_version_id":"fdf3a8f941fbef2384bb76aeed4a0de96fd96b739b7374eb2263d7c1ab1f82c8","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-73259984748de484976ef2ad56ad7ab3d4cb4518","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-26 08:27:56.461216+00:00","record_version_id":"1be558b93e79110bba75daae2e0901175cf6100ea7398553898acced7dd41048","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-741602fbc6252c232a0b9e6bc1a9ae3101625f5a","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 22:49:32.522034+00:00","record_version_id":"2ad9ea7e2579f79a70c4d6c8ba969b426b7c201af4fdafc52ec5158dc6194e79","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-7774f45558276ec29bf626e58fffb4a27bdbb2a9","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-11-01 11:49:36.359151+00:00","record_version_id":"8aea867387e428fb2dc55b3cad92d3d26936be493ba1f3cc161967d3cb2c2dff","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-7ab7c5e783fc8ebef8b8ee8cea019ee37a72ce74","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-09-28 04:58:07.340658+00:00","record_version_id":"7a17d2955cf6f2d3afabaf006d11e034318e6a531a3bc78668f7b3ba231ed4c0","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-7b2f22d83ea05055ab90dcb77dc802382cccc6f7","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 17:56:46.096741+00:00","record_version_id":"6a2a3b3a2ffafc116a4de3461bc983b04a87edb053bc64e64c9ab106e6371097","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-7ca1175502be18eb51f7b016818a884a43fd4ebb","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-29 06:28:23.644795+00:00","record_version_id":"f0898eea25907f072389bb9981ac9dc6fed31a3eeb2f94d645f2edcdd43088a7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-7d8cee5e42602ad9ba5dc0322085af2fa0dffaac","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 01:15:19.291664+00:00","record_version_id":"8e0024b86a7c1c27b6e65d57648b496ac0c467a3e6b25321d359d83dc9514635","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-81a0d6a7f668c98c59bd05fa988aa079c5ad1f68","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-31 07:49:50.419452+00:00","record_version_id":"9e7790911d6b068818f5dfe18f716774be2690e65b468262161dd66c49b64de6","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-82f31c08c746a214872494cde6ecaeb9330441b4","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-17 21:26:08.547156+00:00","record_version_id":"c691244d91e9a9e8783848a8ff6a1dc2f5590eb3709f4384dcac142fa678208f","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-84c248343c5a99ab42c5616c594812a5e3e31cbb","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-04 06:00:07.487827+00:00","record_version_id":"96f62624c8427c63353fb3e74cc8237f717d2257c428add5bab1cccc1832b957","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-86334e7275e315853287e8580c35456c68df800b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 06:53:03.336354+00:00","record_version_id":"e6c72a006b0b5b3c7c2704f8f22c2db982dad89a1ab0e67586212d702b74f51a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-8686dc1664f93a6c05f50321410961b39b12f91b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-28 10:17:41.595894+00:00","record_version_id":"a18f1352975f78d98ac9fbc93991aaed561ca7cf286a05bb6283b02a6f5f3200","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-86d941366886c9a14a2581c04e20d0bdd25e1b02","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-31 04:54:14.656039+00:00","record_version_id":"e9836ccd172e402320a26fc8f6231817178505be2c6627933bf7a6f4df7491d8","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-8ba1d2e6cfbb1525b4f9f769ec164fb6ad0f237a","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-02 05:22:45.010398+00:00","record_version_id":"c1043b99dcb4ad000e90aa01920003a082ed86b2cab9ab4e72a6dae45e2ac7cb","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-90e5aa456689a3b222016c05c319bbcd0bddd453","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 02:00:10.037905+00:00","record_version_id":"ef7f8ad85492193b50ba7fb13f0cdd8a1e2e6b4122032cb3917fbbe3cc27d351","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-92d960aa7e4cd6e4c9ac8b2e232092904038e9e4","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-08 01:50:46.451351+00:00","record_version_id":"e5cf645497bb298c19174e1b4e928b7130ea4df1fdf4ca990602227b6214197a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-94002ae588a8f71eca6d64105f2e603e8587293b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 09:01:16.021508+00:00","record_version_id":"bd9a7b4f51cd873b68b6d93e803d18a16d1d9c33bdb0f97b70b85892cb1f5e12","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-9dd575e013c5c6e000ab3ad2d1288cc1dd9c96dc","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-12-21 04:47:46.589081+00:00","record_version_id":"b9eb9514ab8db5735c092199cf17197aa3a0e8bc005e6e91cd520d0789342261","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-a1ea26ed78cbd6e94bc3221e50a6ed9b6bf43871","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 09:16:55.180581+00:00","record_version_id":"96dd5c0972cdaf2220b57d415cbf9d93bee73e988adf05f166d4bfa654bdc903","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-a76a3505853d5ea9c13bb98472b87361d469e2ee","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-28 18:03:41.793846+00:00","record_version_id":"bb49f788727fa6c06855b2b575527395d572fb79d23735e2b1c3f66e4c54ebf3","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-b285d591f6acf3aa1910e02edc297664db86eb8c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-10 22:48:22.460295+00:00","record_version_id":"39f81b8191d8756e943ef012294ffd957f55ce225f88f7eb461b8453f8ea0bcc","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-b79af756e4f00ba98231feb859ed8e98239eb811","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 02:47:56.931581+00:00","record_version_id":"389acf0ce3a71acf0fe0506cd22c6560a7fa893f78ff561754fdf4d728b90ca7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-b89e05b94730c6471439082d9279c0a834a4aeec","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-26 20:25:42.325239+00:00","record_version_id":"01a05e92b944a2e27ce48eb44867b405a1a80cc8b227ee955fd89b107041d77c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-b9279a12d1f2688df9e556183c94d41a89e431dc","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-06 01:49:47.203835+00:00","record_version_id":"4f143c130ed72241a6e44b12bc4b951c83a3be726b5316299ef239c71cdf791c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-bbdc905e96cc681a5e9a8b02c795b682206e36d1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-25 08:02:45.445730+00:00","record_version_id":"992f87c819412793b00ce11388b312d583a06015b634e0e571fd2a9f2306ae47","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-bde225b5243a13d81827aa173e39c78a652b54a0","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-23 07:22:33.219345+00:00","record_version_id":"6390026141750839c588b5af35b9e8116d8986484efc1305f132cbb8c12088aa","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-c1fac4cbfde737f4f4ac02cdf15e6f5a9b5b676d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 01:15:19.291664+00:00","record_version_id":"8e0024b86a7c1c27b6e65d57648b496ac0c467a3e6b25321d359d83dc9514635","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-c6b62be45f8a13cba109ef2a7741b9cd9a6b8272","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-24 08:48:09.035112+00:00","record_version_id":"671a230251d1f262baa65ab333feb223bda0bee2372c5e1ef4828060c11bee12","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-cc83f62cb6db61f39320916d819ad48ce55cd96d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 00:45:35.735230+00:00","record_version_id":"ac3445411e26c439942a644ebbd84f00b4a74399ba0ae872286d7a312c0d9b98","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-d33818a01b6b4c5e2902e704da6e5b713742d4dc","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-10-13 10:46:24.251475+00:00","record_version_id":"8c44f582bdc738fc958bf9e78415ef872113bc3fdbb3463fb60bbebf40999602","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-d3c17db9832d3064916046caf891dd23f10b1bb9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-26 11:30:42.288639+00:00","record_version_id":"a7d438a63c76f17daac141887c999a38c34ba285ef755014475a9cbed9b26eb7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-d4ee226dc44268e9b6767fb9f5f20343322f494b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-15 01:52:23.911697+00:00","record_version_id":"33f0565c8f4559635a60549c17cd01b4a1712c103d7293b91508c5b31a393c90","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-d8f9fc7f136e2033556d9d65bbdbdf33425dbdc9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-28 16:48:12.400438+00:00","record_version_id":"059e02d8b41fda01f6ed6a8664446fa73bdaf4cfc169837514b272b516e007d0","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-dbbc9739c616c3846b2e796e00a36fa41225f7d8","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 17:47:19.325144+00:00","record_version_id":"7b54ca8f88ebf532088691619844533c3be82b98d9e7a1a83ef840a509bd6086","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-dbe5f2d24b48c3177297a3d69c553cc9d1194bac","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-09-14 05:00:27.366070+00:00","record_version_id":"3cedb0d4b24250387cb6ccd9dacd2cb22683571acd859b148e5755e3ced1bf22","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-dd357dc2758e9e282c30988a527ce37de92593b9","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-10-19 01:39:41.951404+00:00","record_version_id":"544fcea651fcc98bfc5179683d98b6aa2c596087f19b2b38ce58ffcaafaa03e7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-de74de559e409a3fe668685e28043b888d2e6841","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-27 07:38:50.882897+00:00","record_version_id":"39a647f4f7f469ab29eb01b8a4be399fa7043fb1631712381d41cd8d9e7b9386","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-deca7188cf536ade3203cd88b52a45e92a059617","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-27 00:37:46.087071+00:00","record_version_id":"83f7732909eec6ab57e4b3734d05a32b4334be6b38fe36059bb19cc6f78e9993","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-df60fa9ac3931c5612b0fa641b7a6f5fbec86fab","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-24 06:36:37.554678+00:00","record_version_id":"06db6bd28d79aabdf2816ead69946cabb858acc8ac76d63a288c3d84084569e0","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-e339da2d849aaf8bb4dceca07a84728af23cf755","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-23 08:49:22.748925+00:00","record_version_id":"4f6f0b8267dd4ab4e1ae1e36bf85ea6fee9729e92b42dada5f4de3252a35666f","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-e934b1784835f5d36ae9b7ef0992b11e72c39142","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 06:21:25.219533+00:00","record_version_id":"a203175bb2cc2bb298ebc3ea786ea7e7fc91c9655493ab2a18c9f03caf413b4a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-ef471690c082448deebd2687eab84b0b78813c36","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-29 01:47:56.317645+00:00","record_version_id":"7d21a13df6ccfdd84473224a2df43c2fdbf6e30e7c015cf3e776749637cbcfdb","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-efc4e8e2cd7c3f68e059a308990c00c77c7611eb","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-10-16 05:48:13.935141+00:00","record_version_id":"c2bce30792d5ba78a64372f7106c7ac30a737036f7dcfd34d45ae235c7fd1e41","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"},{"run_id":"legacy-f18b7749725097d41f69c60779ff38cf073b93b3","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 19:52:03.259353+00:00","record_version_id":"5305948d4f56b56ceb0fe62a3641aceec2fdcc7ed1a2ed5e13c9368354bd840f","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing","official_learning_outcomes_json":"[]"}]