[{"run_id":"20260906T231458-5fdd2fff","semester":"1272","observed_at":"2026-09-06 23:14:58.172943+00:00","record_version_id":"33ebc0f463cf601246f755d3cc739d8a1b2316320efe611ab06cdebbc4f9daf0","course_id":"POLISCI 367","course_uid":"course_f8ee06982dc170ac32b403c3","catalog_version_id":"8ce98e1f3627a1866342f4cb73a64f37e47dea1a5b0715d7e4b2c0bf52d942c3","course_number":367,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"HUMANS, ANIMALS & MACHINES","description":"Animals and machines play a large and increasing role in human affairs. Many political systems and cultures have traditionally placed human beings and human rights at the center of politics. Advocates of animals and artificial intelligence challenge this. As a result, political theory in the twenty-first century must address the role of non-humans in politics and examine the relative priority of human beings. What rights, if any, should non-humans have and on what basis? Can even we say what it means to be distinctively human? Is there something about our language, intelligence, consciousness, dignity or emotions that clearly distinguishes us from animals or machines? Can that distinctiveness support consequential moral or political conclusions? Is there a clear basis for human or non-human equality upon which we can ground rights or democratic institutions? Or must all of these yield to a post-humanist politics of some kind?","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"20260907T155543-ce3781c4","semester":"1272","observed_at":"2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00","record_version_id":"33ebc0f463cf601246f755d3cc739d8a1b2316320efe611ab06cdebbc4f9daf0","course_id":"POLISCI 367","course_uid":"course_f8ee06982dc170ac32b403c3","catalog_version_id":"8ce98e1f3627a1866342f4cb73a64f37e47dea1a5b0715d7e4b2c0bf52d942c3","course_number":367,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"HUMANS, ANIMALS & MACHINES","description":"Animals and machines play a large and increasing role in human affairs. Many political systems and cultures have traditionally placed human beings and human rights at the center of politics. Advocates of animals and artificial intelligence challenge this. As a result, political theory in the twenty-first century must address the role of non-humans in politics and examine the relative priority of human beings. What rights, if any, should non-humans have and on what basis? Can even we say what it means to be distinctively human? Is there something about our language, intelligence, consciousness, dignity or emotions that clearly distinguishes us from animals or machines? Can that distinctiveness support consequential moral or political conclusions? Is there a clear basis for human or non-human equality upon which we can ground rights or democratic institutions? Or must all of these yield to a post-humanist politics of some kind?","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"}]