[{"run_id":"20260906T231458-5fdd2fff","semester":"1272","observed_at":"2026-09-06 23:14:58.172943+00:00","record_version_id":"fed97efe9b4a36812f819c146a61d770e28df73ba24ae694e7d39192d0435425","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"20260907T155543-ce3781c4","semester":"1272","observed_at":"2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00","record_version_id":"fed97efe9b4a36812f819c146a61d770e28df73ba24ae694e7d39192d0435425","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-03b0bbb9723907cf3d1b41cf0bb34837dc398e42","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-04-16 05:20:33.104844+00:00","record_version_id":"6f6c9bdd392805ca200966da01fea721441f74821ca36bcee1707ca4b5ec913c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-0837245627eb714ae6bb0375f7abe8f41042011f","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-04-16 05:20:33.104844+00:00","record_version_id":"6f6c9bdd392805ca200966da01fea721441f74821ca36bcee1707ca4b5ec913c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-08c92e359bbbc110b0778b7e0b15d6f40000e6b1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-21 07:05:14.730696+00:00","record_version_id":"e3d97ff20f022a13f7dbfeb02921c9cddf6cc460930699ddb8bfa897b65d9394","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-0944d76440dc778fbb89626058c10451009ce9c6","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 03:36:18.194118+00:00","record_version_id":"3faf8350c2f079ec06cbdfa0cef8133b9fabec0e357923eec5162b857c596aa9","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-0a7f4bce29c816ef4d3d71b4eb8a2a3e15e33cc1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-18 20:04:02.695444+00:00","record_version_id":"8c286325007891b187978bd54add4b361a8b38063e53d2b912e672f41981b62b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-0ab917f827a7de22ebdc1087114d377a31c4687b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 02:11:02.531191+00:00","record_version_id":"e0bafce1bccaef31d09dd91ce341d2300d15e4d2cb13141519d69af4ae9905d4","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-0c40ecab4b6db9333d1f18aef816e3ee659e300c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 18:02:34.797617+00:00","record_version_id":"94668759e48372a1e84d3d7f3ba7c2bb29ee400817a734432c4cf9072f79c05b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-0cb4d29a588ec7f11c7e00b7cf5dc3a0d23d0349","semester":"1266","observed_at":"2026-01-22 01:00:26.555427+00:00","record_version_id":"1e637bb5cc47423267cc1524cc9d430692aea38bb8514fcb0a328cc4c16e4b6c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-11c30ec39e91498cbfcf3a923c53a4b03e387280","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-20 04:58:26.847117+00:00","record_version_id":"9aaa496984f3cd9c6e416c80283afc92433465db454385d76ae8da3de815fabe","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-13cd500edf2587e9a3428f326253738fbea965ea","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-12-14 04:50:04.653658+00:00","record_version_id":"9524bb13f3653fa7b112112fed812029e4e3ff28d4d24abfae87aa13d6494a61","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-1da08b2de39f05e6bc877c189fc2fd6eeda563f5","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-01 00:03:56.707251+00:00","record_version_id":"bbed2222527780e27d813f1e511a7aa992999eafaf95141a52c228c3fa6132e5","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-2031af47efe133b0e7877f433286ff07385afc41","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-02 20:16:45.749584+00:00","record_version_id":"68875c95dfb77aaca4550a37f93058712669622d8f0e458baac65eacb728fd30","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-238eba6f32fbc30407f616dd0628ff02a2a824dd","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-17 05:15:07.788352+00:00","record_version_id":"db6c115d97a9193c3efab4f6d01dc5f26c145c9497cf87d03a62546af4b06071","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-25f0ff56bc4d80f8a8afa1a0bcce8dae6fddb5e5","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 17:20:25.942090+00:00","record_version_id":"d302dbe7a518335a6ce5dd23780e3a2370b3a5a4504471d61949ddd222b829ba","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-2923f91826ce253b7aeefa9f75b4a39fe4c80ff0","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-10 05:10:25.938416+00:00","record_version_id":"62be59c599b0c3a7956a2d2c55e568197f2ff3c1d814705d07b15efc2bbc421b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-2a05214a4023e0157fa6f7d188c85308f714176c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-09-07 04:56:38.255315+00:00","record_version_id":"1fd8c4b6e5af4f9e1b568c36dd64bd7b215c0eacead7f1abdbe56b390de28615","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-2b1b8e39131de92b94620b25c5bbb25690efed4c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 07:54:53.913454+00:00","record_version_id":"d873179218ac3dea6dcae09d3f501714c7e7c352e2560221f7a18c180f2b1520","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-33a1225644e5a5855d60f66e65413946e72fedf4","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-22 01:52:05.152650+00:00","record_version_id":"037d8470334fb2b0fc9fa3ae59e47bbd12bce513b44f039f7cc1950d6b15f604","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-3b89c83dbf5208e13756184de1f2b2d0c09af35f","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 06:40:10.235522+00:00","record_version_id":"4995951fb364031e07ece77b0216c5b0bdf8909a7c78809b07d8fcdbbd5aa1b9","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-3c3eebf7f35c39364b445a2fa5a112ce28dbb4a1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 17:03:59.062985+00:00","record_version_id":"f6f0521fe87511772c1954f3d3648bf5a6d5ae2630f940efc40d899d906c7b4a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-3fa4dd71391f1c9cf4ab2216680bbc428689f92d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 01:15:58.180530+00:00","record_version_id":"0953667d95366d929b068f78b0487727fd54575d3ecd7e01698f572fd533bd4c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-4040aa216da722a34483f68fc1e129ea571ae08d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 07:27:39.695506+00:00","record_version_id":"1e1a9834bf687cb5c3a04f327e4fac313041e9394d3313c64eb531837ff11523","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-454d53cd690294459f8ad0793cc3ed562060e56c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 01:34:00.536004+00:00","record_version_id":"ef7f8ad85492193b50ba7fb13f0cdd8a1e2e6b4122032cb3917fbbe3cc27d351","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-486f091e051fdb4ccdb80ee7b4fb0a5814510324","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-11-16 05:32:31.273726+00:00","record_version_id":"5c8c9cea7df60a0158fc4bdd4ce639ee98831719f59ece36de42e00e1ca4e879","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-50393cfc5fd5598d4f4731ef1919f2ff53af07d9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 06:05:57.438846+00:00","record_version_id":"c552ed944f20935e4fa1a640afdf10f4d3cf1de077ddd0c835dbabb9a01447e7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-50f6947786b208c800db8bbd0cec84a8f0f187d2","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-02 03:49:42.915428+00:00","record_version_id":"da5e3298d523754926bde4a2ab138c9f120bbaf9f8fdb9b170425d088b72d641","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-51d86ed4082dced3803c295419b0ec8440942016","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-11-12 04:50:41.141307+00:00","record_version_id":"5de0341eaa406fc68797646de87925c1b945506c2de9d916ddc4d025f6f08ac1","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-53101bd1c10db0d00d094e4c9154d4c244ff23d9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-10-05 04:58:05.366968+00:00","record_version_id":"439949288a36ee302aa822eec1b709dc6776a5b4267cc4b360fe6fbaccc4b29e","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-58751151c564e11c5cb8aedd3a2d3527c22f73eb","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 06:59:01.536576+00:00","record_version_id":"be052bd1c50812da79706e951aef69f4661098b74f2cede0a63e3167791cb155","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-5c4c8d3701a333ba4ddadef7d0b5dde8440fcdf0","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 01:57:51.256704+00:00","record_version_id":"f9ea7a8e8d6d10ee61f744811e29f1a0665a8e889c82c624e9b843b40b48190c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-5d20d9f81651d3c83fcaa2fd10870ce6e5d5a685","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 16:48:48.484741+00:00","record_version_id":"2e0995906bb009a0d1be95ff8d99e38c45c86a34ac61c99af571eb44a19ea8a3","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-5feaebf2ab37051c86ad360cc0fa0d7e0e2ea295","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-24 15:58:23.378859+00:00","record_version_id":"0d76d91f3e9fab11d7371aae7276c6fc1f553cbc43627df2aa6a1ba2d365400a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-60949965544fce098cc006354e201149005fb77b","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-10-26 05:07:14.077864+00:00","record_version_id":"e0bde528187e49e3d751f1df360f64b12d37551d5a78f40b405a8700575a3a1c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-639225ac3addf8522f1d30cb4fe26054ea7f8c49","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 08:14:42.497608+00:00","record_version_id":"fd41181cfb2df878ea32929b90c6778e72ce104ab8ccb2c45cb0094a832f74b2","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-64093b17b3a9c67a41aa33eb37adb53ec38df714","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 02:11:02.531191+00:00","record_version_id":"0602c9570b9d330979ddb61ba123595a9e42c68cccd2890092aee74dd5112b2b","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-6885b56099f55e08aa0205546369fb0381d50e13","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-13 04:59:22.367394+00:00","record_version_id":"1b47eefc77659e913ff2f81379f360791f9b8a485c8646d8884c7dea7b05030c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-69d4b2b16e8268f75b6390b3a0e2ce8bf73999da","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 03:21:29.925498+00:00","record_version_id":"505cf0e771d14f39e6eb551fe22f1bc39a8416dd6798f0ac900929b140ad5f75","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-6b29c3e0673b2f9a736d2363db5409e03d5b3ed4","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-12-03 12:33:41.418072+00:00","record_version_id":"fdf3a8f941fbef2384bb76aeed4a0de96fd96b739b7374eb2263d7c1ab1f82c8","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-73259984748de484976ef2ad56ad7ab3d4cb4518","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-26 08:27:56.461216+00:00","record_version_id":"1be558b93e79110bba75daae2e0901175cf6100ea7398553898acced7dd41048","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-741602fbc6252c232a0b9e6bc1a9ae3101625f5a","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-30 22:49:32.522034+00:00","record_version_id":"2ad9ea7e2579f79a70c4d6c8ba969b426b7c201af4fdafc52ec5158dc6194e79","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-7774f45558276ec29bf626e58fffb4a27bdbb2a9","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-11-01 11:49:36.359151+00:00","record_version_id":"8aea867387e428fb2dc55b3cad92d3d26936be493ba1f3cc161967d3cb2c2dff","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-7ab7c5e783fc8ebef8b8ee8cea019ee37a72ce74","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-09-28 04:58:07.340658+00:00","record_version_id":"7a17d2955cf6f2d3afabaf006d11e034318e6a531a3bc78668f7b3ba231ed4c0","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-7b2f22d83ea05055ab90dcb77dc802382cccc6f7","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 17:56:46.096741+00:00","record_version_id":"6a2a3b3a2ffafc116a4de3461bc983b04a87edb053bc64e64c9ab106e6371097","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-7ca1175502be18eb51f7b016818a884a43fd4ebb","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-29 06:28:23.644795+00:00","record_version_id":"f0898eea25907f072389bb9981ac9dc6fed31a3eeb2f94d645f2edcdd43088a7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-7d8cee5e42602ad9ba5dc0322085af2fa0dffaac","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 01:15:19.291664+00:00","record_version_id":"8e0024b86a7c1c27b6e65d57648b496ac0c467a3e6b25321d359d83dc9514635","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-81a0d6a7f668c98c59bd05fa988aa079c5ad1f68","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-31 07:49:50.419452+00:00","record_version_id":"9e7790911d6b068818f5dfe18f716774be2690e65b468262161dd66c49b64de6","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-82f31c08c746a214872494cde6ecaeb9330441b4","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-17 21:26:08.547156+00:00","record_version_id":"c691244d91e9a9e8783848a8ff6a1dc2f5590eb3709f4384dcac142fa678208f","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-84c248343c5a99ab42c5616c594812a5e3e31cbb","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-04 06:00:07.487827+00:00","record_version_id":"96f62624c8427c63353fb3e74cc8237f717d2257c428add5bab1cccc1832b957","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-86334e7275e315853287e8580c35456c68df800b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 06:53:03.336354+00:00","record_version_id":"e6c72a006b0b5b3c7c2704f8f22c2db982dad89a1ab0e67586212d702b74f51a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-8686dc1664f93a6c05f50321410961b39b12f91b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-28 10:17:41.595894+00:00","record_version_id":"a18f1352975f78d98ac9fbc93991aaed561ca7cf286a05bb6283b02a6f5f3200","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-86d941366886c9a14a2581c04e20d0bdd25e1b02","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-31 04:54:14.656039+00:00","record_version_id":"e9836ccd172e402320a26fc8f6231817178505be2c6627933bf7a6f4df7491d8","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-8ba1d2e6cfbb1525b4f9f769ec164fb6ad0f237a","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-02 05:22:45.010398+00:00","record_version_id":"c1043b99dcb4ad000e90aa01920003a082ed86b2cab9ab4e72a6dae45e2ac7cb","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-90e5aa456689a3b222016c05c319bbcd0bddd453","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 02:00:10.037905+00:00","record_version_id":"ef7f8ad85492193b50ba7fb13f0cdd8a1e2e6b4122032cb3917fbbe3cc27d351","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-92d960aa7e4cd6e4c9ac8b2e232092904038e9e4","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-08 01:50:46.451351+00:00","record_version_id":"e5cf645497bb298c19174e1b4e928b7130ea4df1fdf4ca990602227b6214197a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-94002ae588a8f71eca6d64105f2e603e8587293b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 09:01:16.021508+00:00","record_version_id":"bd9a7b4f51cd873b68b6d93e803d18a16d1d9c33bdb0f97b70b85892cb1f5e12","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-9dd575e013c5c6e000ab3ad2d1288cc1dd9c96dc","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-12-21 04:47:46.589081+00:00","record_version_id":"b9eb9514ab8db5735c092199cf17197aa3a0e8bc005e6e91cd520d0789342261","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-a1ea26ed78cbd6e94bc3221e50a6ed9b6bf43871","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-25 09:16:55.180581+00:00","record_version_id":"96dd5c0972cdaf2220b57d415cbf9d93bee73e988adf05f166d4bfa654bdc903","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-a76a3505853d5ea9c13bb98472b87361d469e2ee","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-28 18:03:41.793846+00:00","record_version_id":"bb49f788727fa6c06855b2b575527395d572fb79d23735e2b1c3f66e4c54ebf3","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-b285d591f6acf3aa1910e02edc297664db86eb8c","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-10 22:48:22.460295+00:00","record_version_id":"39f81b8191d8756e943ef012294ffd957f55ce225f88f7eb461b8453f8ea0bcc","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-b79af756e4f00ba98231feb859ed8e98239eb811","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 02:47:56.931581+00:00","record_version_id":"389acf0ce3a71acf0fe0506cd22c6560a7fa893f78ff561754fdf4d728b90ca7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-b89e05b94730c6471439082d9279c0a834a4aeec","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-26 20:25:42.325239+00:00","record_version_id":"01a05e92b944a2e27ce48eb44867b405a1a80cc8b227ee955fd89b107041d77c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-b9279a12d1f2688df9e556183c94d41a89e431dc","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-06 01:49:47.203835+00:00","record_version_id":"4f143c130ed72241a6e44b12bc4b951c83a3be726b5316299ef239c71cdf791c","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-bbdc905e96cc681a5e9a8b02c795b682206e36d1","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-25 08:02:45.445730+00:00","record_version_id":"992f87c819412793b00ce11388b312d583a06015b634e0e571fd2a9f2306ae47","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-bde225b5243a13d81827aa173e39c78a652b54a0","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-23 07:22:33.219345+00:00","record_version_id":"6390026141750839c588b5af35b9e8116d8986484efc1305f132cbb8c12088aa","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-c1fac4cbfde737f4f4ac02cdf15e6f5a9b5b676d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 01:15:19.291664+00:00","record_version_id":"8e0024b86a7c1c27b6e65d57648b496ac0c467a3e6b25321d359d83dc9514635","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-c6b62be45f8a13cba109ef2a7741b9cd9a6b8272","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-24 08:48:09.035112+00:00","record_version_id":"671a230251d1f262baa65ab333feb223bda0bee2372c5e1ef4828060c11bee12","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-cc83f62cb6db61f39320916d819ad48ce55cd96d","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-22 00:45:35.735230+00:00","record_version_id":"ac3445411e26c439942a644ebbd84f00b4a74399ba0ae872286d7a312c0d9b98","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-d33818a01b6b4c5e2902e704da6e5b713742d4dc","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-10-13 10:46:24.251475+00:00","record_version_id":"8c44f582bdc738fc958bf9e78415ef872113bc3fdbb3463fb60bbebf40999602","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-d3c17db9832d3064916046caf891dd23f10b1bb9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-08-26 11:30:42.288639+00:00","record_version_id":"a7d438a63c76f17daac141887c999a38c34ba285ef755014475a9cbed9b26eb7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-d4ee226dc44268e9b6767fb9f5f20343322f494b","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-15 01:52:23.911697+00:00","record_version_id":"33f0565c8f4559635a60549c17cd01b4a1712c103d7293b91508c5b31a393c90","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-d8f9fc7f136e2033556d9d65bbdbdf33425dbdc9","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-28 16:48:12.400438+00:00","record_version_id":"059e02d8b41fda01f6ed6a8664446fa73bdaf4cfc169837514b272b516e007d0","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-dbbc9739c616c3846b2e796e00a36fa41225f7d8","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 17:47:19.325144+00:00","record_version_id":"7b54ca8f88ebf532088691619844533c3be82b98d9e7a1a83ef840a509bd6086","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-dbe5f2d24b48c3177297a3d69c553cc9d1194bac","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-09-14 05:00:27.366070+00:00","record_version_id":"3cedb0d4b24250387cb6ccd9dacd2cb22683571acd859b148e5755e3ced1bf22","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-dd357dc2758e9e282c30988a527ce37de92593b9","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-10-19 01:39:41.951404+00:00","record_version_id":"544fcea651fcc98bfc5179683d98b6aa2c596087f19b2b38ce58ffcaafaa03e7","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-de74de559e409a3fe668685e28043b888d2e6841","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-27 07:38:50.882897+00:00","record_version_id":"39a647f4f7f469ab29eb01b8a4be399fa7043fb1631712381d41cd8d9e7b9386","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-deca7188cf536ade3203cd88b52a45e92a059617","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-27 00:37:46.087071+00:00","record_version_id":"83f7732909eec6ab57e4b3734d05a32b4334be6b38fe36059bb19cc6f78e9993","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-df60fa9ac3931c5612b0fa641b7a6f5fbec86fab","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-24 06:36:37.554678+00:00","record_version_id":"06db6bd28d79aabdf2816ead69946cabb858acc8ac76d63a288c3d84084569e0","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-e339da2d849aaf8bb4dceca07a84728af23cf755","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-07-23 08:49:22.748925+00:00","record_version_id":"4f6f0b8267dd4ab4e1ae1e36bf85ea6fee9729e92b42dada5f4de3252a35666f","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-e934b1784835f5d36ae9b7ef0992b11e72c39142","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-01 06:21:25.219533+00:00","record_version_id":"a203175bb2cc2bb298ebc3ea786ea7e7fc91c9655493ab2a18c9f03caf413b4a","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-ef471690c082448deebd2687eab84b0b78813c36","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-06-29 01:47:56.317645+00:00","record_version_id":"7d21a13df6ccfdd84473224a2df43c2fdbf6e30e7c015cf3e776749637cbcfdb","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-efc4e8e2cd7c3f68e059a308990c00c77c7611eb","semester":"1264","observed_at":"2025-10-16 05:48:13.935141+00:00","record_version_id":"c2bce30792d5ba78a64372f7106c7ac30a737036f7dcfd34d45ae235c7fd1e41","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"},{"run_id":"legacy-f18b7749725097d41f69c60779ff38cf073b93b3","semester":"1262","observed_at":"2025-05-21 19:52:03.259353+00:00","record_version_id":"5305948d4f56b56ceb0fe62a3641aceec2fdcc7ed1a2ed5e13c9368354bd840f","course_id":"POLISCI 338","course_uid":"course_f2c15f337cc1b02cb59d736a","catalog_version_id":"6bd060b499a7cff82df5767d4ec3fa27357feef8fe68aa9c2fa196396dc6da31","course_number":338,"subjects":["POLISCI"],"title":"THE CIVIL-MILITARY PARADOX IN U.S. POLITICS AND SOCIETY","description":"Protecting a democratic nation from foreign threats often requires that nation to create a powerful military. Yet the creation of a powerful military may undermine the democracy that it is designed to protect. How do, and how should, democracies manage the paradoxical relationship between civilian authority and military institutions. Explores civilian and military perspectives in U.S. civil-military relations; address issues such as the use of military advice by civilian leaders, military challenges to civil authority, and tensions generated by shared responsibility for national security between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. Studies how civil-military relations impact wider American society by examining the garrison state hypothesis; debates centered upon the draft versus an all-volunteer force; issues of equity and inclusion; and current concerns regarding a civil-military \"gap.\"","requirements_text":"Sophomore standing"}]