Homework is usually due weekly and relevant to exams, with TAs cited as helpful resources. Attending class is considered important, and using the textbook and labs aids understanding, though labs can be confusing.
Raw average: 4.68/5 from 150 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 4.7/5 raw quality · 2.1/5 difficulty · 31
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Pupa Gilbert is described as sweet, passionate, and clear, with reviewers noting her engaging lectures and helpful example problems. Some students found her hands-on approach and fun energy made the material accessible and interesting.
One reviewer found her self-invented terms annoying, while another criticized her condescending praise during lectures. A separate concern raised is that her TAs rarely respond to student emails.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.71 GPA, 86.6% A/AB (n=186 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.66 GPA, 84.5% A/AB (n=207 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.67 GPA, 84.0% A/AB (n=169 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Raw average: 3.27/5 from 11 quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average (3.66/5), weighted as 20 additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 2.3/5 raw quality · 3.3/5 difficulty · 3
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Victor Brar receives criticism for unclear expectations and confusing problem-solving demonstrations, with one reviewer finding his lectures rushed and lacking care. Another review notes that while he split-teached with Pupa Gilbert, his performance fell short of her quality.
In a different term, Brar split-teached with Professor Balantekin, where lecture slides were helpful and attendance was deemed critical. Homework was relevant to exams, and TAs were praised as the best resource, though labs were described as confusing.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2022: 3.50 GPA, 74.7% A/AB (n=229 letter grades); Spring 2023: 3.53 GPA, 79.0% A/AB (n=243 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.71 GPA, 86.6% A/AB (n=186 letter grades). Includes jointly taught sections.
Historical reviews of Carrie Francis: Carrie Francis receives mixed reviews; one student found her helpful and midterms easy, while others criticized her lectures as boring, confusing, and poorly aligned with labs. Multiple reviewers noted she fails to explain concepts well, forcing students to learn independently.
BRIAN REBEL is recorded teaching in Spring 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
CARRIE FRANCIS is recorded teaching in Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
PUPA GILBERT is recorded teaching in Fall 2006, Fall 2008, Spring 2009, Fall 2009, Spring 2010, Spring 2011, Fall 2011, Spring 2012, Fall 2013, Spring 2014, Fall 2015, Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
SUSAN COPPERSMITH is recorded teaching in Fall 2008, Fall 2010, Spring 2011, Fall 2011, Fall 2012, Fall 2013, Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2016, Fall 2018. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
VICTOR BRAR is recorded teaching in Fall 2021, Fall 2022, Spring 2023, Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
113 / 160
0
LEC 002
Classroom Instruction
49 / 160
1
LAB 305
Classroom Instruction
19 / 24
0
LAB 306
Classroom Instruction
22 / 24
0
LAB 307
Classroom Instruction
24 / 24
1
LAB 308
Classroom Instruction
12 / 24
0
LAB 309
Classroom Instruction
12 / 24
0
LAB 310
Classroom Instruction
0 / 0
0
LAB 311
Classroom Instruction
22 / 24
0
LAB 314
Classroom Instruction
0 / 0
0
LAB 316
Classroom Instruction
0 / 0
0
LAB 317
Classroom Instruction
0 / 0
0
LAB 315
Classroom Instruction
16 / 24
0
LAB 301
Classroom Instruction
21 / 24
0
LAB 312
Classroom Instruction
14 / 24
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Reviewers describe Pupa Gilbert as sweet, passionate, and clear, noting her engaging lectures and helpfulness. One reviewer contrasts her positively with Victor Brar, stating he was not great while Gilbert was amazing.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.71 GPA, 86.6% A/AB (n=186 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.66 GPA, 84.5% A/AB (n=207 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.67 GPA, 84.0% A/AB (n=169 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Homework is usually due weekly and relevant to exams, with TAs cited as helpful resources. Attending class is considered important, and using the textbook and labs aids understanding, though labs can be confusing.
Some students find Gilbert's invented terms or condescending praise annoying, and her TAs may be unresponsive. Brar's lectures are described as rushed and unclear, leading one student to skip class and self-study instead.
Topics
Sound and sound perception
Harmony, musical scales, and instruments
Light, lenses, photography, and color
Skills
Understanding sound perception
Understanding musical fundamentals
Understanding optics and color
Grades
Historical instructor
Fall 2026 · Projected
Before grades are released
3.373.37–3.893.89average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade. The center uses 5 same-season terms, weighted toward recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
8 earlier forecasts · 0.12 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Fall 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.673.67GPA
Higher than 4545% of other courses
in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
169169letter grades
More recorded grades than 8484% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30
recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded
grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.