Pharmaceutical Sciences Grant Writing
Recorded 2026-10-14Pharmaceutical Sciences Grant Writing
Develop an NIH F31-style predoctoral fellowship grant proposal in pharmaceutical sciences through peer review, collaboration, and critique.
Summary
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2026: 4.00 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=8 letter grades).
What you’ll be able to do
Summarize scientific logic and planned experiments through an abstract, narrative, and specific aims page
Articulate background, significance, and innovation of proposed work
Outline methodologies to address a specific set of research questions that include proper controls and analysis methods
Describe the NIH grant review process
Assess the scientific merit of a grant through preparing written and verbal feedback of peer proposals
Source: UW Guide
Grade history
↗All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors
Prerequisites
Course mapDeclared in Pharmaceutical Sciences PhD
- Declared in Pharmaceutical Sciences PhD
This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Prerequisite text tree
- Declared in Pharmaceutical Sciences PhD
Professors
Spring 2027No instructors recorded for this selection.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027Schedule loads here as you scroll.
| Section | Mode | Enrolled / capacity | Waitlist |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEC 001 | Online (some classroom) | 0 / 20 | 0 |
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Meeting source records
Student experience
the class
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2026: 4.00 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=8 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
No workload feedback recorded.
Topics
- NIH F31 predoctoral fellowship grant proposal development
- NIH grant review process
- Background, significance, and innovation articulation
Skills
- Develop NIH F31-style predoctoral fellowship grant proposals in pharmaceutical sciences
- Summarize scientific logic and planned experiments through abstracts, narratives, and specific aims pages
- Outline research methodologies including proper controls and analysis methods
- Assess scientific merit of grants through written and verbal peer feedback
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Spring 2027.
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Not enough comparable courses for Spring 2027 in UW–Madison.
Sources & history
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.
Selected offering source records
Raw records
[
{
"run_id": "20261014T203208-0851c9a1",
"semester": "1274",
"observed_at": "2026-10-14 17:50:09.728220+00:00",
"offering_id": "1274:718:027231",
"course_id": "PHMSCI 741",
"course_uid": "course_ef2a232a59799af6cbc949af",
"term_id": "1274",
"source_course_id": "027231",
"source_subject_id": "718",
"title": "Pharmaceutical Sciences Grant Writing",
"credits_min": 1,
"credits_max": 1,
"typically_offered": "Not Applicable"
}
]Student reviews
Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.
Read original reviews
No records available.
Grade history
Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.
Explore recorded gradesRecorded 2026-10-14
Model outputs & technical records
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces
Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.
Model & dataset provenance
{
"model": "Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B",
"model_revision": "1d4bf0f2ff6012fd82039f2fa52739d0dd7c60c0",
"task_version": "17",
"output_id": "53fbdf3d54c37978a13c6ee924c27614a3842009b950f0653ebc5f3a1d62653c",
"requirements_status": "valid",
"dataset_revision": "fc1811fa52e581ea57a35c0cf3343f8740a8ffbf",
"observed_at": "2026-10-14 17:50:09.728220+00:00"
}