Historical reviewers found the workload light, noting that assignments were straightforward and often completed during class. Exams were described as lecture-heavy, requiring preparation based on lecture content.
Raw average: 3.50/5 from 2
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
No course-specific feedback yet.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews for Kristin Eschenfelder describe her as helpful, caring, and effective at making technical content accessible. Reviewers note her straightforward assignments and lecture-heavy exams, with one citing group projects as time-consuming.
KRISTIN ESCHENFELDER is recorded teaching in Fall 2022, Fall 2023, Fall 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LAB 001
Classroom Instruction
83 / 85
9
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Historical reviews for Kristin Eschenfelder describe the course as easy and engaging, with straightforward assignments and helpful instruction. The current instructor is Aaron Enright, whose teaching style is not covered by these reviews.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.79 GPA, 89.4% A/AB (n=85 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.72 GPA, 88.4% A/AB (n=95 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.68 GPA, 86.4% A/AB (n=88 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviewers found the workload light, noting that assignments were straightforward and often completed during class. Exams were described as lecture-heavy, requiring preparation based on lecture content.
Students reported that historical instruction was helpful, with clear explanations of technical concepts and supportive lab assistance. Group projects were noted as interesting but time-consuming.
Topics
Database application lifecycle
Data modeling and relational design
SQL queries and interfaces
Database documentation
Skills
Database design, management, and application
Data modeling and SQL query writing
Creating reports, interfaces, and documentation
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A65.9%65.9%
AB20.5%20.5%
B8.0%8.0%
BC0.0%0.0%
C3.4%3.4%
D2.3%2.3%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.683.68GPA
Higher than 4848% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
8888letter grades
More recorded grades than 6363% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.