Geography of Wisconsin
GEOG 342 provides an overview of the physical and human geography of Wisconsin, emphasizing the processes that shaped the state.
Summary
Historical reviews describe heavy workloads, including seven grueling papers and large readings, with one instructor assigning peer grading.
Grade history
↗letter grades
All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors
Prerequisites
Course mapSophomore standing
- Sophomore standing
This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Prerequisite text tree
- Sophomore standing
Professors
Fall 2026No instructors recorded for this selection.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews of Joseph Mason: Joseph Mason's teaching receives polarized reviews. One student found the online format solid with small assignments, while another criticized the volume of technical papers and peer grading, calling the instructor terrible.
ELSA NOTERMAN is recorded teaching in Spring 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
ERIN CLANCY is recorded teaching in Spring 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
JOSEPH ADLAND MASON is recorded teaching in Spring 2016, Spring 2022, Spring 2024, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026Schedule loads here as you scroll.
| Section | Mode | Enrolled / capacity | Waitlist |
|---|
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.
Meeting source records
No records available.
Student experience
the class
Historical reviews of Erin Clancy: Erin Clancy created a highly recommended, thoughtfully designed online asynchronous class with clear assignments and engaging Wisconsin-specific content.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2024: 3.52 GPA, 79.6% A/AB (n=162 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.71 GPA, 86.1% A/AB (n=180 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.71 GPA, 86.5% A/AB (n=193 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviews describe heavy workloads, including seven grueling papers and large readings, with one instructor assigning peer grading.
Historical reviews of Elsa Noterman, Erin Clancy, Joseph Mason: Students praised clear expectations and interesting topics, while others criticized unhelpful rubrics and irrelevant technical papers.
Topics
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
GPA
Higher than % of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
letter grades
More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.
Selected offering source records
No offering records for the selected term.
Raw records
[]
Student reviews
Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.
Read original reviews
Grade history
Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.
Explore recorded gradesModel outputs & technical records
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces
Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.
Model & dataset provenance
{
"model": "nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4",
"model_revision": "1355db6a052410cfd62085d94b58866fd0f2c3c5",
"task_version": "14",
"output_id": "50778da422b9a6e7a1b9f685e0049009c8ae439d26c4b7d8feb290a2ce0737aa",
"requirements_status": "valid",
"dataset_revision": "e243353dcb7d79b7247ced91d69443ef4c2a6349",
"observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00"
}