Special Topics in Engineering Physics
EP 602 covers special topics in Engineering Physics, with subject matter and credits varying by offering.
Summary
Historical reviews of Scott Williams: Students must complete extensive background reading for each session, in addition to discussion responses, quizzes, and two formal assignments.
Grade history
↗letter grades
All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors
Prerequisites
Course mapNone
- None
This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Prerequisite text tree
- None
Professors
Fall 2026No instructors recorded for this selection.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews of Scott Williams: Scott Williams taught this seminar with extensive background reading and graded participation through discussion responses, quizzes, and two assignments. Reviewers found the seminar recordings difficult to understand due to poor quality and criticized the discussion prompts as unimaginative and rushed.
SCOTT WILLIAMS is recorded teaching in Fall 2016, Spring 2017, Fall 2017, Spring 2018, Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Spring 2020, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Fall 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026Schedule loads here as you scroll.
| Section | Mode | Enrolled / capacity | Waitlist |
|---|
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.
Meeting source records
No records available.
Student experience
the class
Historical reviews of Scott Williams: This seminar course is graded on participation, quizzes, and two assignments, but the experience is marred by poor recording quality and extensive reading requirements.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2021: 3.90 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=20 letter grades); Spring 2022: 3.96 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=27 letter grades); Fall 2022: 3.97 GPA, 100.0% A/AB (n=19 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviews of Scott Williams: Students must complete extensive background reading for each session, in addition to discussion responses, quizzes, and two formal assignments.
Historical reviews of Scott Williams: Reviewers found seminar recordings difficult to understand due to quality issues and criticized discussion prompts as unimaginative and rushed.
Grades
Latest available · Fall 2022— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
Grades over time
Through Fall 2022
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Not enough comparable courses for Fall 2026 in UW–Madison.
Sources & history
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.
Selected offering source records
No offering records for the selected term.
Raw records
[]
Student reviews
Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.
Read original reviews
Grade history
Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.
Explore recorded gradesModel outputs & technical records
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces
Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.
Model & dataset provenance
{
"model": "nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4",
"model_revision": "1355db6a052410cfd62085d94b58866fd0f2c3c5",
"task_version": "14",
"output_id": "f0c09975d544b304ab3869e583c0c077e09a682d7c69bb9c8c66f91c229017e9",
"requirements_status": "valid",
"dataset_revision": "e243353dcb7d79b7247ced91d69443ef4c2a6349",
"observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00"
}