Spring 2027

Green Screen: Environmental Perspectives Through Film

Examines how film shapes public and scientific understandings of nature, using American cinematic examples to explore environmental ideas and contested representations of race, class, and gender.

no offering record for this termCredits unavailable
Recorded instructors · Spring 2027 No instructors listed

Summary

1 / 6

Past student reviews · Gregg Mitman

TAs were described as tough graders, and students did not know their grades at any point during the semester, making it unsuitable for seeking an easy A.

What you’ll be able to do

  • Interpret film as a historical document and place it in a particular historical context.

  • Describe the changing historical contours of environmentalism and how the past continues to shape diverse perspectives relating to the meaning and representation of "the environment," particularly with respect to issues of class, gender, and race.

  • Identify major environmental issues and controversies of the past, present, and future in the United States and around the world.

Source: UW Guide 1 UW Guide 2 UW Guide 3

Grade history

↗
average GPA
letter grades
A
AB
B
BC
C
D
F

All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors

Prerequisites

Course map

None

  • None
ENVIRST/HISTORY/HISTSCI 125

This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.

Prerequisite text tree
  • None

Professors

Spring 2027

No instructors recorded for this selection.

Historical instructors & teaching patterns

GREGG ALDEN MITMAN is recorded teaching in Fall 2013, Fall 2015, Fall 2021. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.

Calendar & sections

Spring 2027

Schedule loads here as you scroll.

SectionModeEnrolled / capacityWaitlist

Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.

Meeting source records

No records available.

Student experience

the class

Past student reviews · Gregg Mitman

Students found the class entertaining but noted that lectures sometimes failed to connect effectively with the assigned movies and readings.

Recent recorded grades — Fall 2017: 3.14 GPA, 44.0% A/AB (n=134 letter grades); Fall 2021: 3.51 GPA, 77.8% A/AB (n=144 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.72 GPA, 86.3% A/AB (n=51 letter grades).

difficulty & workload

Past student reviews · Gregg Mitman

TAs were described as tough graders, and students did not know their grades at any point during the semester, making it unsuitable for seeking an easy A.

Past student reviews · Gregg Mitman

While the course was not considered horrible, one student found the lectures boring and expressed frustration with the lack of transparency regarding their grade status.

Topics

  • Cinema as a lens for understanding changing environmental ideas, beliefs, and cultural meanings in the United States.
  • Race, class, and gender in on-screen representations of nature and environmental debates.
  • Historical environmental visions and their real-world impacts on people and wildlife.
  • Using film as a historical document to analyze environmental history.

Skills

  • Interpret films as historical documents within specific historical contexts.
  • Analyze how environmentalism's historical development shapes current perspectives on the environment, including class, gender, and race.
  • Identify major environmental issues and controversies across time and geography.

Grades

Latest available · Spring 2025— not enough history to project Spring 2027.

average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor

Grade distribution · % of letter grades

A
AB
B
BC
C
D
F

Grades over time

Through Spring 2025

More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data

Where this course fits relative to

Latest available grades · Spring 2025 · all course levels

GPA

Higher than % of other courses in this group.

Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range

letter grades

More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.

Typical course in this group: letter grades.

About this comparison

1286 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.

Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.

Sources & history

UW–Madison

Catalog & offerings

Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.

Catalog observation history

Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.

Selected offering source records

No offering records for the selected term.

Raw records
[]
Rate My Professors

Student reviews

Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.

Read original reviews
Madgrades

Grade history

Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.

Explore recorded grades
Model outputs & technical records
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces

Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.

Model & dataset provenance
{
  "model": "Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B",
  "model_revision": "1d4bf0f2ff6012fd82039f2fa52739d0dd7c60c0",
  "task_version": "17",
  "output_id": "5fdc13d96b060810a650225f4da43a9db90abb2fc0ec64f2d1212a00056d1e78",
  "requirements_status": "valid",
  "dataset_revision": "fc1811fa52e581ea57a35c0cf3343f8740a8ffbf",
  "observed_at": "2026-10-14 17:50:09.728220+00:00"
}