Examines laboratory and field experiments for economic questions, focusing on experiment design, result interpretation, and applications in policy, development, markets, and behavior.
The course structure made the material unnecessarily confusing, and the instructor seemed to have trouble getting to the root of the papers.
What you’ll be able to do
Describe what experimental economics is and is not.
Discuss the fundamental statistical tools and issues relating to experimental methods in economics.
Design, carry out, and evaluate the results of basic economic experiments using concepts from survey design, applied statistics, game theory, and behavioral economics.
Explain important economic models, experiments, games, and experimental results in the development and application of experimental economics.
Raw average: 2.78/5 from 73
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 3.0/5 raw quality · 3.0/5 difficulty · 1
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · David Hansen
David Hansen was described as smart and passionate, though students found the class structure unnecessarily confusing. Some feedback noted that he struggled to highlight the core takeaways of the papers.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.12 GPA, 42.9% A/AB (n=21 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.28 GPA, 51.4% A/AB (n=37 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
DAVID HANSEN is recorded teaching in Spring 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 45
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
David Hansen was described as smart and passionate, though the class structure made the material unnecessarily confusing at times.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.12 GPA, 42.9% A/AB (n=21 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.28 GPA, 51.4% A/AB (n=37 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · David Hansen
The course structure made the material unnecessarily confusing, and the instructor seemed to have trouble getting to the root of the papers.
Past student reviews · David Hansen
The instructor appeared to have difficulty identifying what he wanted students to know from the assigned papers.
Topics
Economic policy, development economics, uncertainty, market behavior, market design, auctions, finance, altruism, and bargaining.
Statistical models, survey design, game theory, incentives, and behavioral economics.
Skills
Designing economic experiments and understanding their results.
Applying statistical models, survey design, game theory, incentive understanding, and behavioral economics.
Carrying out and evaluating basic economic experiments.
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Spring 2027.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A27.0%27.0%
AB24.3%24.3%
B29.7%29.7%
BC16.2%16.2%
C2.7%2.7%
D0.0%0.0%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.283.28GPA
Higher than 1616% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
3737letter grades
More recorded grades than 1313% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.