Introduction to applied econometrics covering statistical methods for evaluating empirical relationships and testing economic theory, with emphasis on applying these methods to real-world data using modern statistical software.
McKelvey's course included problem sets and exams; he said exams were hard but curved them.
What you’ll be able to do
Discuss the properties of an ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator for a linear regression model
Test theories about the true model using formal hypothesis tests
State the assumptions underpinning OLS, recognize violations of these assumptions, discuss the consequences of such violations, and - where possible - suggest alternative statistical approaches that are more appropriate given the circumstances
Evaluate the extent to which econometric methods can be used to determine whether a statistical association represents a causal relationship
Use statistical software to apply these statistical techniques to analyze the relationship between real-world economic variables
Read and interpret results from applied economics journal articles that employ these statistical techniques
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may
have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the
catalog requirements above.
Raw average: 4.63/5 from 93
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
For this course: 4.8/5 raw quality · 3.5/5 difficulty · 13
reviews
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
Past student reviews · Christopher McKelvey
Christopher Mckelvey taught this course with problem sets and two exams that comprised 64% of the grade. Students reported that exams were difficult but curved, while one review criticized the teaching as lacking individual attention.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.11 GPA, 43.9% A/AB (n=205 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.07 GPA, 42.0% A/AB (n=143 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.06 GPA, 42.6% A/AB (n=197 letter grades).
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Past student reviews · Matthew Friedman
Students described Matthew Friedman’s lectures as interesting and the exam material as straightforward, noting it was easier than the homework. Some reported he cared about students and that the class material was top-notch, while others found his sarcasm rude but excusable.
CHRISTOPHER MCKELVEY is recorded teaching in Fall 2018, Spring 2019, Fall 2019, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Spring 2022, Spring 2023, Fall 2023, Spring 2024, Fall 2024, Spring 2025, Fall 2025, Spring 2026. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MATTHEW FRIEDMAN is recorded teaching in Spring 2020, Fall 2022. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Spring 2027
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
0 / 216
0
DIS 301
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 302
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 303
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 304
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 305
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 306
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 307
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 308
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
DIS 309
Classroom Instruction
0 / 24
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
McKelvey taught the challenging, exam-heavy course and explained concepts clearly.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2025: 3.11 GPA, 43.9% A/AB (n=205 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.07 GPA, 42.0% A/AB (n=143 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.06 GPA, 42.6% A/AB (n=197 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Past student reviews · Christopher McKelvey
McKelvey's course included problem sets and exams; he said exams were hard but curved them.
Past student reviews · Christopher McKelvey
One student found the class mostly fluff and felt the professor seemed to teach as if the class were much larger.
Topics
Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimation and linear regression models
Formal hypothesis testing for econometric models
OLS assumptions, violations, and alternative statistical approaches
Causal inference and distinguishing association from causation
Application of statistical techniques to real-world economic variables
Interpretation of applied economics research literature
Skills
Discuss OLS estimator properties for linear regression models
Apply formal hypothesis tests to evaluate model theories
Identify OLS assumption violations and suggest alternative statistical approaches
Assess causal interpretation of statistical associations
Analyze real-world economic variables using statistical software
Interpret results from applied economics journal articles
Grades
Historical instructor
Spring 2027 · Projected
Before grades are released
2.642.64–3.513.51average GPA
Approximate 80% prediction interval
0.04.0
About this estimate
The course’s semester-average GPA, not an individual student’s grade.
The center uses 5
same-season terms, weighted toward
recent results.
The range uses the finite-sample 80th-percentile rank of absolute errors
from earlier same-season forecasts. Each forecast uses only records from
earlier terms. At least four forecasts are required; bounds are rounded
outward and limited to 0–4. This is an empirical estimate: changing
instructors or grading policies can reduce its coverage.
6 earlier forecasts · 0.13 GPA average error.
Grades over time
Through Spring 2027
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
3.063.06GPA
Higher than 66% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
197197letter grades
More recorded grades than 8787% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 66.066.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1280 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.