Reviewers describe the class as having a heavy workload with significant reading and difficult exams, though one notes the instructor curves grades to historical averages.
Raw average: 3.73/5 from 15
quality ratings. The adjusted rating blends this with the UW review average
(3.66/5), weighted as 20
additional ratings. Smaller samples stay closer to that average. Each
captured review is counted once in the prior; this does not correct who
chooses to leave a review.
RMP profile ↗ · All captured review dates; profile matched by name.
No course-specific feedback yet.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Matthew Sinclair provides clear lectures and is accessible, with a heavy workload and tough grading that curves to historical averages. However, one historical review criticizes his depth and reliance on external sources, while others praise his sincerity and student care.
DAVID A. WOOD is recorded teaching in Fall 2006, Fall 2008, Spring 2014, Fall 2014, Spring 2015, Fall 2015. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
MATT SINCLAIR is recorded teaching in Fall 2018, Fall 2020, Fall 2021, Fall 2024, Fall 2025. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future
schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026
Schedule loads here as you scroll.
Section
Mode
Enrolled / capacity
Waitlist
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
7 / 50
0
LEC 001
Classroom Instruction
37 / 50
0
Times are Central. Select a meeting for
details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections. Enrollment reflects scan time.
Historical reviews for Matthew Sinclair present a polarized experience, with students praising his accessibility and effort while others criticize his lecture quality and course design.
Recent recorded grades — Fall 2024: 3.50 GPA, 77.4% A/AB (n=31 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.36 GPA, 63.6% A/AB (n=11 letter grades); Fall 2025: 3.58 GPA, 81.6% A/AB (n=38 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Reviewers describe the class as having a heavy workload with significant reading and difficult exams, though one notes the instructor curves grades to historical averages.
Historical reviews of Matthew Sinclair: Students report that Matthew Sinclair is extremely accessible and cares about student understanding, providing good feedback and support outside of class.
Topics
Processor design and computer arithmetic
Pipelining and control units
Memory hierarchies and I/O structures
Skills
Design and analysis of advanced processor components, including pipelining, vector processing, and cache memories.
Grades
Latest available · Fall 2025— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
average GPA
A / AB grades
letter grades
Instructor
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
A34.2%34.2%
AB47.4%47.4%
B18.4%18.4%
BC0.0%0.0%
C0.0%0.0%
D0.0%0.0%
F0.0%0.0%
Grades over time
Through Fall 2025
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Fall 2025 · all course levels
3.583.58GPA
Higher than 3838% of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
3838letter grades
More recorded grades than 1616% of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: 70.070.0 letter grades.
About this comparison
1320 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded
letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure
of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by
recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade
counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section
size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20
higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median
recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+.
Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
UW–Madison
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.