Survey of Botany
Survey of Botany covers the ecological roles of plants and microbes and their historical and modern uses by humans.
Summary
Historical reviews of Ingrid Jordon-Thaden, Linda Graham: Workload varies from manageable with heavy extra credit to overwhelming. Some terms require over 50 pages of weekly reading and long lectures, while others feature dense textbooks and quizzes that do not always align with lecture content.
Grade history
↗letter grades
All recorded terms · compare terms & instructors
Prerequisites
Course mapNone
- None
“Used by” includes alternatives; linked courses may have other requirements. This is a best-effort interpretation; check the catalog requirements above.
Prerequisite text tree
- None
Professors
Fall 2026No instructors recorded for this selection.
Historical instructors & teaching patterns
Historical reviews of Linda Graham: Linda Graham’s course history shows polarized experiences. Some students found her nice and the class an easy lab credit with significant extra credit opportunities. Others reported boring lectures, excessive reading, and frustrating quizzes that made the course difficult despite the extra credit.
INGRID JORDON-THADEN is recorded teaching in Spring 2019, Spring 2022, Spring 2023, Spring 2024. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
LINDA GRAHAM is recorded teaching in Spring 2007, Spring 2008, Spring 2009, Spring 2010, Spring 2011, Spring 2012, Spring 2013, Spring 2014, Spring 2015, Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018, Spring 2020. Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Recorded history may be incomplete and does not establish a future schedule.
Calendar & sections
Fall 2026Schedule loads here as you scroll.
| Section | Mode | Enrolled / capacity | Waitlist |
|---|
Times are Central. Select a meeting for details; export includes recorded dates for the selected sections.
Meeting source records
No records available.
Student experience
the class
Historical reviews of Ingrid Jordon-Thaden, Linda Graham: Reviews describe a polarizing course with significant variation in quality and workload depending on the instructor. Students report either easy extra-credit opportunities or frustrating, dense reading requirements with misaligned assessments.
Recent recorded grades — Spring 2024: 3.64 GPA, 75.6% A/AB (n=135 letter grades); Spring 2025: 3.48 GPA, 72.3% A/AB (n=141 letter grades); Spring 2026: 3.07 GPA, 43.6% A/AB (n=110 letter grades).
difficulty & workload
Historical reviews of Ingrid Jordon-Thaden, Linda Graham: Workload varies from manageable with heavy extra credit to overwhelming. Some terms require over 50 pages of weekly reading and long lectures, while others feature dense textbooks and quizzes that do not always align with lecture content.
Historical reviews of Ingrid Jordon-Thaden, Linda Graham: Experiences range from highly positive, with instructors described as nice and considerate, to extremely negative, citing boring or disorganized lectures and frustrating grading structures. Some students find the course easy with extra credit, while others feel sabotaged by quiz content.
Topics
Skills
Grades
Latest available · Spring 2026— not enough history to project Fall 2026.
Grade distribution · % of letter grades
Grades over time
Through Spring 2026
More grade details Grade mix, volume & source data
Where this course fits relative to
Latest available grades · Spring 2026 · all course levels
GPA
Higher than % of other courses in this group.
Course GPAs · red marks this course’s range
letter grades
More recorded grades than % of other courses in this group.
Typical course in this group: letter grades.
About this comparison
1283 courses over the same term, each with at least 30 recorded letter grades. Cross-listed courses count once. GPA is not a measure of difficulty or teaching quality. The typical course is the median by recorded grade count; tied values are not counted as lower. Grade counts describe course scale, not unique students or typical section size.
Descriptions compare GPA with this group’s average: at least 0.20 higher or lower; otherwise close to average. Section size uses median recorded enrollment: small up to 30, mid-sized 31–99, large 100+. Lectures and discussion/lab sections are described separately.
Sources & history
Catalog & offerings
Descriptions, prerequisites, and recorded course offerings.
Catalog observation history
Observations at scan time; dates do not imply when a catalog change took effect.
Selected offering source records
No offering records for the selected term.
Raw records
[]
Student reviews
Original comments behind the course and instructor summaries.
Read original reviews
Grade history
Recorded grade distributions by term, section, and instructor.
Explore recorded gradesModel outputs & technical records
LLM outputs across runs
Full model traces
Recorded model configuration, reasoning, and tool conversations.
Model & dataset provenance
{
"model": "nvidia/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-NVFP4",
"model_revision": "1355db6a052410cfd62085d94b58866fd0f2c3c5",
"task_version": "14",
"output_id": "1471541439ec95e0341f67a620b855037a77f910b38a2f85c85e96653e13473b",
"requirements_status": "valid",
"dataset_revision": "e243353dcb7d79b7247ced91d69443ef4c2a6349",
"observed_at": "2026-09-07 15:55:43.033547+00:00"
}